September 26, 2011

Christie Insiders: No Means No

WSJ has the story:

A determined cadre of Republican donors is casting wishful eyes on New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie in an 11th-hour push to persuade the former prosecutor to enter the 2012 presidential race.

The drive reflects lingering discontent in some GOP quarters over the current crop of GOP candidates, particularly since the recent stumbles of Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who has led in national polls of Republican voters.

Mr. Christie’s aides say the governor hasn’t budged from his months-long insistence that he won’t enter the presidential fray, despite what one described as a “relentless” stream of calls over the last week from prominent Republicans urging him to run.

“None of that triggers any new thinking on his part,” said one Christie adviser. “He’s very polite to these people: ‘Thank you for calling. That’s very flattering. I’ll let you know.’ And I think they interpret that, ‘Ah-ha! A rethinking.’ “

Be sure to read the entire piece here.

by @ 10:47 am. Filed under Chris Christie
Trackback URL for this post:
http://race42012.com/2011/09/26/christie-insiders-no-means-no/trackback/

94 Responses to “Christie Insiders: No Means No”

  1. Booyeah Says:

    Can we put this thing to bed now?

  2. Dr J Says:

    Panic and fear grip the undecided. Run as fast you can boys, but it will do you no good. Or you can come to your senses.

  3. ccr Says:

    I sure hope so!! “I say what I mean. I mean what I say!”

    I sure hope that Christie’s integrity and word comes through. (unlike Perry who told voters last year, “I’m not!” as well as numerous times since……..but then flipflopped!! haha and he tries that immature flipflop on Romney when Perry has his own!! ie. guardasil and NY gay rights state support)

  4. teledude Says:

    I think he was right a couple months ago.

    Suicide is Christie’s only option to shut these morons up.

    You guys think they are unhappy with Romney…and that’s part of it, but only because they know he doesn’t hold a candle against Governor Palin.

    They FEAR Governor Palin, and she has cast a huge shadow over this entire process.

    This has been a parade of ‘who can stop Palin’…the Bachmann move looked both brilliant and desperate, so Sarah just waited her out. Perry’s star flashed, but Governor Palin knows him well and knew it wouldn’t take long for him to implode…there is even some evidence she ‘goaded’ him into running, knowing they wanted someone to block her entry, and he took the bait.

    She is shown herself to be a masterful political tactician…this may be be written about and studied for decades to come.

    You guys, of course, are blind to all this, and probably doubt my words. Don’t do that…as many have already discovered, you just end up looking foolish.

    I’m just here to help.

  5. Metro Says:

    Damn.

    Rudy?

  6. Thomas Alan Says:

    1:

    We won’t be able to put this to bed until either 2013 comes, or Christie makes good on his suicide threat. Hell, even if he did commit suicide, I suspect The Weekly Standard would start running Elvis-style Christie sightings for the next decade in the vain hope he’d come back and run.

  7. DaveG NOT for Mondays Says:

    No, this will be put to rest on Oct 31st, when the filing deadline for the FL primary passes.

    Romney’s the nominee, and probably the next POTUS.

  8. Thomas Alan Says:

    7:

    Honestly, it wouldn’t surprise me if whispers of “3rd party” start up even after the voting starts. Not to mention, I’m not convinced Florida’s filing deadline is the actual deadline. It just means whoever runs will skip Florida.

  9. asparagus Says:

    Kristol’s problem is if he didn’t come up with the idea, its not any good. He is responsible for McCain and Palin, among others. The guys thinks too much outside of the box. Even Fox News is coming around to Romney now. Tea party rage can only last so long. Eventually, people decide they actually want to win.

  10. greg Says:

    question on palin is this her week she has to decide i say lets hurry up and decide Palin the political guessing game is getting tiring on your decision she says end of Sept. but i heard a rumor this morning she might delay it till November? .

  11. Metro Says:

    It is such a waste to have the country in such a mindset for slashing government, only to install a government-loving technocrat like Mitt Romney in the White House.

  12. Texas Conservative Says:

    Off topic, Kavon, but you are being cited over at NRO:

    Did Romney Say He’d Keep the Individual Mandate?
    April 19, 2010 11:30 A.M.
    By Daniel Foster

    Yes, according to Rightosphere’s Kavon Nikrad, who asked Romney if he would repeal the individual mandate and the ban on exclusions for preexisting conditions:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/198139/did-romney-say-hed-keep-individual-mandate/daniel-foster

  13. Texas Conservative Says:

    That was being tweeted and retweeted today:

    bdomenech Ben Domenech
    When Romney was asked in 2010 about whether he’d repeal the individual mandate, he said “No.” Anyone followed up? bit.ly/opKkxq

  14. Metro Says:

    If Romney were to refer at a debate to reading a book such as The Road to Serfdom, he might actually win over some small government types. There’s no cost to doing so.

    But he has never once indicated there he has any history or ellegiance to any small government thinking, period.

    Just to free markets. But that’s only half the picture.

    Just doesn’t get it.

  15. Try Not To Laugh At My 1.9 GPA perry Says:

    What shiny object will they run to next? Looking like a bunch fools!!!

  16. greg Says:

    question on palin is this her week she has to decide i say lets hurry up and decide Palin the political guessing game is getting tiring on your decision she says end of Sept. but i heard a rumor this morning she might delay it till November? . guess what i am asking is can she now wait till November. AM not a Palin backer right now all i got to say is DECIDE palin the guessing game is getting old!

  17. hamaca Says:

    9. Yeah, even Fox realized they couldn’t keep artificially propping up Perry after what a disaster he’s turned out to be on a number of levels.

  18. drob Says:

    I can’t believe you folks haven’t read his economic book all 160 pgs. He’s laid his plan on the table and still we have people who question. Read the economic book. He can’t be planner. Spin from newspapers doesn’t mean anything. His book explains what he’ll do and the effect of that action. Read the book you’ll like it. It’s free.

  19. Jeff Says:

    #4 Teledude… really? How many polls have been conducted that overwhelmingly say that people DON’T want Sarah to run? I respect her, but people don’t think she’s the right person to be the nominee.

  20. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    14

    There is a major cost to doing so. It would be seen as pandering.

  21. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    OKAY, I’M SICK OF THIS!

    Chris Christie needs to announce a national press conference in NYC on TV.

    At the press conference, he needs to firmly, sternly, and unwaveringly declare his insistence that he is not running for president in 2012, and everyone needs to get on with their lives.

  22. Booyeah Says:

    12, that was quickly clarified, and I believe Romney mentioned not repealing the pre-existing condition stuff, but yes to repealing the IM.

    Fairly certain about that.

  23. Watchinitall Says:

    “Sir, any chance you will run?”

    “Yeah. One in a million.”

    “So you’re saying there’s a chance!”

  24. Try Not To Laugh At My 1.9 GPA perry Says:

    Looks like it’s time for Obama to cut his fishing line with perry on the end, and open up the tackle box and see what else he can trick the fools with!

  25. thetruth Says:

    If a third party is what Palin means by an “unconventional election” she will be the next Perot and give Obama the Presidency for another four years. I hope she isn’t that stupid and egotistical.

  26. Watchinitall Says:

    Honestly, it seems like every cycle some of these wannabe players end up on the sidelines, not chosen as advisors or spokespeople, or what-have-you, so with media access they deserately attempt to pump up some alternative hoping against hope to be taken to the prom.

  27. Perry/Cain 2012! Says:

    8) Aaaaaand Perry still holds his lead after all is said and done!

    CNN poll: Perry on top..

    POLICICO.COM | 9/26/11 12:10 PM EDT

    A CNN poll taken after the last two debates shows that despite widely-panned performances, Rick Perry is still besting Mitt Romney:

    According to the survey, which was released Monday, 28 percent of Republicans and independents who lean towards the GOP say they support Perry as their party’s presidential nominee, with Romney at 21 percent. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is at ten percent, with Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who’s making his third bid for the White House, former Godfather’s Pizza CEO and radio talk show host Herman Cain, and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, all at seven percent. The poll indicates that Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota is at four percent, with former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania at three percent and former Utah Gov. and ambassador to China Jon Huntsman at one percent.

    Palin has flirted with a bid for the GOP nomination, but the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee has not taken any concrete steps towards launching a campaign. Taking Palin out of the mix produces a similar result: 30 percent for Perry, 22 percent for Romney, 11 percent for Gingrich, and all other candidates in single digits.

    The poll was conducted Friday through Sunday, after last Thursday’s debate in Orlando, Florida.

  28. Jeff Says:

    27, give it a week, and wait for the news to cover the straw poll this week. Also, wait for STATE polls to come out.

  29. marK Says:

    Money quote from the article:

    “But Christie is a guy who through his whole career has said what he means, and he has said no.”

    When is it going to sink into these people’s thick skulls that that is one of Christie’s most basic, fundamental traits? It is what makes him so appealing.

    Does it not occur to them that the very trait that attracts people to Christie is the very trait they want to compromise in trying to get him to run?

  30. Booyeah Says:

    Link? What were the numbers at the last poll? Trends matter here, trends.

  31. Greg Says:

    Rasmussen reporting that Romney is leading their national poll, which started on Saturday

  32. thetruth Says:

    27 Perrywinckle

    It took you two days to find a sliver of news that didn’t look like your boy Perry cottontail down and out.
    Good for you,

  33. David Says:

    Seems to me the most likely late entry is the man who’s been pushing the others: Mitch Daniels. His new book has been well-received, and he’s successfully remained in the game even after deciding against running.

    Obviously, the reason he’s stayed out is because of a desire not to put his wife through any scrutiny of her past erratic behavior. But if that’s a hurdle that can be overcome, why not?

    He still represents the perfect profile for this cycle: governor of a heartland state; business experience, education reformer; budget expert (though his time at GWB’s OMB is also a problem) and social conservative. Perhaps a bit charisma-challenged, but he can go toe-to-toe with anybody intellectually. No history of flip-flops.

    He recognizes the need for a new candidate. Well, if that’s the case he needs to step up to the plate.

  34. Reginald from Texas Says:

    There is supposedly a new Florida poll coming out this week with Romney as a big leader, by high single digits

  35. Booyeah Says:

    Here’s the last CNN poll:

    http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/09/11/rel15a.pdf

    As you can see, Romney was down 12, now down 7.

    Trends, dude. Trends.

  36. Reginald from Texas Says:

    33. Daniels is too late

  37. blue Says:

    maybe these white knighters will turn to rick santourm since i think this has more to do with not wanting romney than anything else.

  38. David Says:

    #36 – You may be right. But from all accounts there’s a shadow “campaign in waiting” — a lot of establishment money and political talent that’s been sitting on the sidelines. It’s the group that’d mobilize behind Christie, or Ryan, so why not Daniels?

    But I agree that a very late entry is normally most plausible by a grassroots type – eg Palin.

  39. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    27

    Weekend poll. Next!

    Weekend polls are notoriously inaccurate, and they always favor candidates like Rick Perry.

  40. Booyeah Says:

    39, and even then, Romney has substantially improved.

  41. Thomas Alan Says:

    38:

    Because only political wonks know who Daniels is. And, for that matter, why would we think Daniels do any better than Pawlenty did? They pretty much occupy the same territory, and Daniels, while he’s a perfectly competent candidate, hardly sizzles on the trail.

  42. Thomas Alan Says:

    I was rather expecting a poll or two to lag behind reality. Let’s wait a week and see what happens. Afterall, not everyone saw the debate, but the fact that Perry did horrible during it is making its way through the bloodstream.

  43. Tom Says:

    ppppolls PublicPolicyPolling
    Thursday night part of our Florida poll Romney led Perry by 2. Friday-Sunday part Romney led Perry by 10. Debate did matter.

  44. Booyeah Says:

    43….WOW.

  45. David Says:

    #41 – Here’s why Daniels would get a much closer look than Pawlenty ever did:

    1) The buzz surrounding his late entry would make him the center of conversation for several days;
    2) Pawlenty never had the DC or private sector experience Daniels had;
    3) Presumably, Daniels won’t want for money like TPaw did.
    4) TPaw’s final nail was going toe-to-toe with Bachmann during her surge, while the spectre of Rick Perry hung over him.

    Truth is, Pawlenty ran a strategically and tactically flawed campaign. I don’t think it speaks to what Daniels can do.

    And does Mitt Romney “sizzle” on the trail? Let’s face it; most of his support results from voters casting him as the right candidate to beat Obama – his positive intensity is meager.

    A well-timed Daniels entry could work.

  46. Mark in PA Says:

    37
    Santorum endorsed Mitt in ’08. And he hasn’t really attacked him this whole cycle.
    Same for Bachmann. Ditto on Cain.
    Huntsman attacks Mitt, but isn’t going anywhere with the base.
    Gingrich has way too much baggage.
    Ron Paul has a hard ceiling.

    There is no one left for the anti-Mitt vote. Time to get on the train and start focusing on beating Obama.
    There’s still plenty of time for Mitt to make a huge blunder, but does anyone really think he will??? And if he does… can someone like Cain really beat Obama? I don’t think anybody else is even a realistic option at this point.

    Palin can get in if she wants. She’d land right on her face.

  47. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    I cannot wait to see credible national polls such as Rasmussen, MSNBC, CBS, Marist, etc

    These polls will have been conducted this week, when quality samples are much more easily attainable.

  48. Booyeah Says:

    45, and, a lot of Romney supporters, me included, would be intrigued by Daniels. My primary requirement is simple COMPETENCE. Nominee Daniels or Nominee Romney, either is good with me.

  49. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    Folks, Daniels is not going to run. He already said no, and no one will be excited about him if he did.

    Christie is not going to run. He already said no emphatically, multiple times, and continues to do so, through his people.

    The only people who are considering jumping in that we’ve ever heard of are Sarah Palin and Rudy Giuliani. Let’s talk about them instead.

  50. Mark in PA Says:

    48
    I’ll admit that I was pretty bummed when Mitch and Barbour both bowed out. That would have been a great field. But I think Mitt would still be my #1 – mostly because I know much more about him and have been so impressed by what I’ve learned. Admittedly, I don’t know nearly as much about Mitch, but I would do my homework if he does enter.

  51. Thomas Alan Says:

    45:

    I actually think Romney shines quite well on the trail, but that’s neither here nor there.

    What I meant by sizzle, is having the ability to come into the race and dominate it. Romney doesn’t have to do that, he’s running a traditional race where he needs to be a long distance runner. I rather think Daniels has the skills to do that too. But I don’t see Daniels as having the ability to come in and create a groundswell that will sweep him to the nomination. He’s just not that type of candidate.

  52. K.G. Says:

    IMO Romney has more sizzle than Daniels.

    And #4 Telly: If Palin were the great hope you claim, how come we don’t hear of all the establishment money begging and begging and begging her to run as they are Christie?

  53. Perry/Cain 2012! Says:

    I though Rombots didn’t trust PPP. LOL! Let’s see what the RCP Florida Average is tomorrow after PPP releases their new numbers — should be very close as Perry currently is up by 2 or 3.

    ppppolls
    The Florida Republican poll will be released in full tomorrow
    50 minutes ago

    ppppolls
    Bachmann all the way down to 6th now in Florida. She’s only ahead of Santorum, Huntsman, and Johnson
    1 hour ago

    ppppolls
    Newt is the only Republican besides Romney and Perry in double digits in Florida.
    1 hour ago

    ppppolls
    Reality check on Huntsmanmentum stories: still at 3% in Florida where his campaign is headquartered
    1 hour ago

  54. blue Says:

    The window is open till oct 31 deadline for flordia ballot, so after christie smartly declines, up next rudy, palin, jeb, etc, etc. This is about weekly standard eggheads not liking romney.

  55. Perry/Cain 2012! Says:

    *thought

  56. blue Says:

    not that those types would be for palin but she still needs to formally decide…come november, if nobody jumps in, i think rick santourm could get a big push from this group.

  57. K.G. Says:

    Apparently Rush hasn’t read the above WSJ article. Busy talking about how a Christie entry would hurt Romney. Well, duh. That would be the point. The establishment doesn’t want the establishment candidate Romney. The establishment wants the unconventional candidate Christie.

  58. Metro Says:

    #45, pt 4: Can you imagine how TPaw feels now, with Michele Bachmann taking him out of the race, only to become an irrelevant joke a few weeks later?

  59. Thomas Alan Says:

    53:

    The RCP Average is utterly useless if there’s been significant movement in the race. I know you’re just itching to throw it out, but outdated polls are worse than nothing. They’re lies you tell yourself.

  60. Bobinator Says:

    27, Craig, I see you changed your title yet again. What happened to Haley? All of your meanderings would be funny if not so pittiful.

  61. David Says:

    #57-

    “The establishment doesn’t want the establishment candidate Romney. The establishment wants the unconventional candidate Christie.”

    That’s actually one of the more astute observations I’ve seen in awhile.

  62. Ben (One of those MittWits) Says:

    60.

    Bob – I’m telling you – his moniker is going to be Cain/Santorum by the end of the month. He has about 2 more weeks till the trends catch up to his last piece of spamming materials in the RCP averages. Perry has gone from 17 up to 12 up to 7 up and now it will get closer to even prior to Perry falling off.

    I can’t forcast who it will be after Cain/Santorum for him though. He catches me off guard with how many anti-mitt name combos he comes up with.

  63. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    57, 61

    Except, is Romney really all that “Establishment?”

    Has anyone on this site ever even defined what they mean by “Establishment?”

    Because the way I look at “Establishment” is someone like George W. Bush. Someone who gets into office, and then grows spending massively, panders to illegal aliens, passes Medicare drug benefits, increases the size of the Dep. of Ed, passes lightbulb mandates, sells out Americans to the Chinese and Brazilians, and does little to drill for more oil.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t see anyone in this field doing anything like that in office as president.

  64. Ben (One of those MittWits) Says:

    you don’t see any of the candidates in the field doing anything like that MassCon??? You’ve seen the chart linked to Perry and his crony captialism – haven’t you?? – you haven’t heard him about illegal aliens?

    He is Bush 3.0

  65. Bobinator Says:

    Ben, he is Bush without a personality and intellect.

  66. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    64

    Well, Perry would do a lot of that, but I wouldn’t see him passing Medicare Part D or No Child Left Behind (unless it’s exclusively for illegals). He wouldn’t pass lightbulb mandates either.

    But he would be a total disaster, and worse than Bush.

  67. Viking Says:

    Weren’t Palin and Giuliani suppose to make their decision by the end of this month or are they both pushing it into October now. Both look foolish since neither has a chance in heck in the general or primary.

  68. teledude Says:

    Sorry I’m late coming back to this thread…

    to address a couple points,

    19. “#4 Teledude… really? How many polls have been conducted that overwhelmingly say that people DON’T want Sarah to run?”

    those are bogus polls of GOP insiders who are probably backing other candidates, of course they don’t want her to run, that’s my point. the people do however (you’ll notice they never ask that question of any pother candidates)

    52. “#4 Telly: If Palin were the great hope you claim, how come we don’t hear of all the establishment money begging and begging and begging her to run as they are Christie?”

    That is my point as well, the establishment doesn’t support her, they are AFRAID of her

    She is a grassroots insurgent candidate of the people, not the political class. She is running against the permanent professional political class of both parties. Christie is the latest one they hope can stop her. They have no faith in Romney being able to head her off and are now in panic mode with the implosion of Perry.

  69. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    All true conservatives deserve a shot on Perry’s ticket.

    :)

  70. Thunder (Any body but the I like illegal immigrants Cowboy) Says:

    Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:
    September 26th, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    All true conservatives deserve a shot on Perry’s ticket.
    ==========================================================
    All true conservatives would never vote for a Perry, Amnesty for Illegal Aliens, candidate.

  71. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    68.

    Implosion by Perry? Not so fast.

    Today’s CNN Poll

    Perry 28 ..as usual, always around 27-30 :)

    Romney 21
    Gingrich 10
    Cain 7
    Paul 7

    Palin 7 :( ..and that’s with Bachmann leaving the scene

  72. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    70.

    See 71 ;)

  73. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    70.

    Huck had the exact same program for about 1% of his college student population, as well.

    I thought you liked Huck? No?

  74. Rightgal. Says:

    Teledelsuional. they are ‘bogus’ polls because you want them to be. Not because they are.
    It’s Sept 26, 2011. She’s still a fox employee as of 9am this morning EST. Tick Tock.

  75. Max Twain Says:

    Lots of stories about Christie attributed to staffers the last few days. It’s entirely possible this is all a ploy by the Governor to boost his fundraising trip for the NJ GOP.

  76. Reginald from Texas Says:

    Which is why all the establishment endorsements have been going to Romney

  77. David Says:

    #68 – It must be nice to live on your planet. :)

    But here on Earth, there simply isn’t this massive Palin army that’s simply waiting for their marching orders, whereby they’ll rise up and seize Tampa without firing a shot.

    There’s a core group of die-hards like yourself and Tex, but the real beating heart of Palinism resides within her fabled “lamestream media.” It’s quite ironic, actually.

    But nothing we write will convince you of that most salient point. So we’ll just have to see.

  78. jack Says:

    Boy is Rush BASHING Romney and the “Establishment”/RINO’s/Moderates, and saying a Tea Party Conservative who is needed to win — ALL BUT POINTING TO PALIN (without having to state her name)

    …Rush BASHING Christie as NOT Conservative

  79. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    Palin has flirted with a bid for the GOP nomination, but the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee has not taken any concrete steps towards launching a campaign. Taking Palin out of the mix produces a similar result: 30 percent for Perry, 22 percent for Romney, 11 percent for Gingrich, and all other candidates in single digits. -Politico.com

    Perry back to his 30! Bingo! :)

  80. Bobinator Says:

    Hey Craig, how about Thunder/Bobinator 2012!

  81. David Says:

    #78 – Rush and the Talk Radio Right ultimately had no influence choosing our 2008 nominee. They HATED McCain.

    But, in the end, they’re all sound and fury, signifying nothing

  82. Ben (One of those MittWits) Says:

    Tele -

    Side note – I hope you didn’t loose $ on my boys this weekend. Had a GREAT 1st half but then coach let 2nd & 3rd string run the show for the 2nd and gave away points on both sides of the ball.

  83. jack Says:

    Hey David, that was then, now is now, POST OBAMA AND POST TEA PARTY!!!

  84. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    78.

    Rush = Perry

  85. Ben (One of those MittWits) Says:

    84.

    There’s a formula for failure in the generals. Thanks for pointing that out Craig.

  86. Thunder (Any body but the I like illegal immigrants Cowboy) Says:

    Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:
    September 26th, 2011 at 1:07 pm

    70.

    See 71
    ===========================================
    Michigan Straw Poll Results — Ron Paul in 4th Place

    Romney — 51%
    Perry — 17%
    Cain — 9%
    Paul — 8%
    Bachmann — 4%
    Gingrich — 4%
    Santorum — 3%
    Huntsman — 2%
    ====================================================
    Another example of Perry’s implosion. When True conservatives vote, Romney wins. Romney beats Perry by a 3-1 margin.

  87. teledude Says:

    821. No they covered for me (I put them in a little 10 point teaser to lower that spread) but I lost my hind quarters on the NFL yesterday…I am really terrible at this, if I weren’t such a degenerate I would just stop.

  88. Thunder (Any body but the I like illegal immigrants Cowboy) Says:

    Rick Perry’s pain proves to be Mitt Romney’s gain
    Experts Texas gov. is ‘flavor of the month’

    • National polling averages at Realclearpolitics.com show Perry’s double-digit lead — rapidly amassed after he announced in mid-August while Romney’s dropped — has narrowed to six points. Romney’s polling graph line is headed back up, Perry’s down.
    • Despite Perry’s nationwide polling gains in his first weeks of campaigning, Romney has maintained strong leads in the first-in-the-nation Granite State.

    • Romney is quickly closing in on Perry in South Carolina, which hosts the nation’s “first in the South” Republican primary.
    http://news.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/2011_0926perrys_pain_proves_to_be_mitts_gain_experts_texas_gov_is_flavor_of_the_month/srvc=home&position=3

  89. teledude Says:

    Embarrassing. Pawlenty begged for a job at FOX and couldn’t get it. I don’t blame Ailes, who would put such a bland personality on TV?

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/64406.html

  90. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    89.

    If Tim would have stayed neutral, he would have landed a job at Fox. But Ailes is not hiring a Romney stooge. No way. No how.

  91. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    86.

    Michigan Willard’s home state? LOL!

    That’s like doing a straw poll in Texas for Perry! :)

  92. Perry/Rubio 2012! Says:

    New Texas PPP scientific (not a rigged straw) poll:

    http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/

    Texas Republicans warming up to Perry bid
    Republican voters in Texas are really warming up to Rick Perry’s Presidential bid and he now leads the field with 49% there to 10% for Mitt Romney, 8% for Newt Gingrich, 7% each for Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul, and Herman Cain, 3% for Rick Santorum, 2% for Jon Huntsman, and 0% for Gary Johnson.

  93. petunia Says:

    Romney doesn’t need to be the frontrunner yet anyway.

    And, as we have seen, Rick Perry is a gaffe master. Let him try to impove his debate skills. Romney needs the practice, he hasn’t got much of a challenge and he is going against “The One”

    If Romney keeps the reputation that he is a killer in debates and then has a bad one against Obama, that would be bad.

    That is one reason having Palin in the race wouldn’t be that bad. So far no one has given Romney practice.

    And as the Thursday night Luntz group demonstrates, when Romney is allowed to defend himself on Romneycare, he puts to rest people’s fears. Lot’s of those people said they weren’t worried about it after they heard Mitt tell it the way it really is.

    But when nobody challenges him he doesn’t get the chance to change minds blinded by the propaganda.

    The part of the GOP establishment like Rush have put horns on Romney’s head. And when people see that he is actually normal and engaging…

    So Palin would be good for Romney. And then she would drop out and then she would endorse Romney like the rest of them.

    All roads lead to Romney in the end.

  94. Rightgal. Says:

    Petunia, while I do agree her ‘run’ would be limited and very, very short, I don’t see why she needs to spend what little political capital she has left. It’s political suicide. All she’ll do is fracture the party even further, and then we won’t have enough time to do the necessary repairs to it, before the election. If she loves this country, she’ll stay far, far away from running.

Leave a Reply

2012 Newswire

Obama Approval


Support R4'12

Meta

Recent Posts

Buy This Book

Categories

Archives

Search

Blogroll

Site Syndication

Main