June 30, 2011

Q2 Fundraising Leaderboard: Huntsman Edition

The first official numbers we get from the Q2 fundraising race is from the man who doesn’t have to (and will not) file an FEC report: Jon Huntsman. He has reportedly raised $4.1 million (and remember, this all comes in the last week or so of the quarter after his announcement).

The twist: this total includes some of Huntsman’s own money — despite promising earlier in the quarter that he would not self-fund.

A Huntsman aide did say that “less than half” of the total was Huntsman’s own money — so Huntsman probably actually raised somewhere between $2 and $3 million.

Until someone else releases their numbers, this puts him at the top of the Q2 fundraising leaderboard:

2011 Q2 Fundraising Leaderboard
Rank Candidate Raised For Primaries Other Revenue
1 Huntsman $2.1 million $2 million
Bachmann
Cain
Gingrich
Johnson
Paul
Pawlenty
Romney
Santorum


UPDATE: CNN reports that just under $2 million of this is Huntsmans’ own money, meaning that Huntsman actually raised just $2.1 million. He only had 10 days to do it in, but this is still not quite the impressive entrance to the race he had been hoping for (especially considering his first fundraiser on the night of his announcement pulled in more than $1.2 million alone).

by @ 11:14 pm. Filed under Fundraising, Jon Huntsman
Trackback URL for this post:
http://race42012.com/2011/06/30/q2-fundraising-leaderboard-huntsman-edition/trackback/

50 Responses to “Q2 Fundraising Leaderboard: Huntsman Edition”

  1. Texas Conservative Says:

    Well as they discussed on Foxnews today, money does not mean a guarantee of the nomination. If it did, we would have had Hillary and Giuliani on the general election ballot. But they both showed that while they had the early money, their message did not win out in the long run.

    Message matters over money.

  2. asparagus Says:

    This is possibly the most useless chart ever (but it looks pretty Matt). If he had announced $1, he would still be “in the lead”. Also, because he doesnt have to file, there is no way of verifying those claims.

  3. Matt Coulter Says:

    Thanks, asparagus. :) The idea, of course, is that when more candidates release their numbers the leaderboard will fill in and mean something.

    But you are absolutely correct as to your last sentence. No way to know how much is self-funded or how accurate the total is.

  4. asparagus Says:

    I know this looks bad, but I categorically deny helping Obama raise money today.

    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/124823709.html?page=2&c=y

    “Catered by restaurateur Stephen Starr, the meal included sirloin aged 30 days, pommes frites, and asparagus served family-style at linen-draped tables for 10 atop a gold-carpeted riser.”

  5. husky Says:

    http://www.christiancentury.org/article/2011-06/mormon-leaders-told-stay-out-politics

    interesting article that states basically that full time LDS church officials are told not to endorse, contribute, or get involved in the campaign. However, local leaders are allowed to support and donate to whomever they want with the understanding that they are acting for themselves and not the church.

    By the way, I remain hopeful that Romney is playing coy and has raised 40 million dollars even though he gave us all a huge head fake. We’ll see… But not until after the 4th I think.

  6. Matt "MWS" Says:

    asparagus,

    Sell out.

    How much did they pay you????

  7. Matt "MWS" Says:

    $2-3 million for a week or two of work would be pretty decent for Huntsman, unless of course, he’s now already burned through his Rolodex.

    There’s no doubt the media loves him, and he fascinates a certain class of pundits. Hell, I’ll give him a look if he catches on and Pawlenty doesn’t, but he’s got to find a connection with the rank and file, and I doubt speaking Chinese is going to do it.

  8. Josiah Schmidt Says:

    this puts him at the top of the Q2 fundraising leaderboard:

    Or, it puts him at the bottom.

    Or, squarely in the middle.

  9. Matt "MWS" Says:

    Josiah,

    Any word on what your man is going to pull? Predictions around here haven’t been very generous.

  10. wateredseeds Says:

    I think of course to most peoples dismay, Ron Paul will end up in the #2 spot. Bachmann will be #3….go ron, we need you now more than ever(too bad you don’t have a chance).

  11. John Mark Says:

    I’m holding out hope that Huntsman will be the canidate who tells it like it is, attacking the sacred cows on both sides of the fence, while at the same time reassuring struggling voters. I will also be happy if he refuses to sign the idiotic no tax pledge. I doubt he would win this way, but he doesn’t have much to lose and he could drum up a lot NH indy and dem support this way.

  12. Heath Says:

    I had hopes for Huntsman but I think it’s pathetic that he flat out LIED only weeks ago when he said that he would not be self funding at all!

  13. afk Says:

    Since he’s not filing, I don’t see how this is any better than the estimates others have announced.

  14. Still Hurting Says:

    Huntsman has received a deferral to report 45 days later than the normal deadline. By the end of August, he will have to officially report his numbers. So, there is an incentive to declare them early to the extent that he gets some free press and that it looks like he is getting some money, and a disincentive to fabricate them since he will ultimately have to officially report them and he would want to be accused of lying.

    Of course, he is defending his “self-funding” as being just the original seed money he put into the campaign at launch.

  15. Still Hurting Says:

    My new guess:

    Total raised, less than $50 million

    Romney – $21 million, plus Super PAC of $15 million
    Paul – $4.6 million
    Pawlenty – $4.8 million, almost a third for the general election ($3 million)
    Bachmann – $4.5 million, half brought over from her congressional campaign ($3 million)
    Gingrich – $2.4 million
    Huntsman – $4.1 million, half self-funded ($2 million)
    Cain – $1.5 million
    Johnson – $.8 million
    Santorum – $.8 million

  16. Matt "MWS" Says:

    Heath,

    Ah well. In 2007 Romney told reporters it’d be a “nightmare” if he had to self fund, implying he would try not to do it, and that was after he had already “loaned” his campaign over $2 million, unbeknownst to the press.

  17. mac Says:

    Another stunner, PPP has Bachmann leading in NM, I’m assuming she’s another flash in the pan, but stunning nonetheless.

  18. Smack1968 Says:

    Still Hurting,

    Your guess on TPAW is goin to be right on the money.

    3 Million Primary – 1.5 Million for General.

    Will not pay vendors until after AMES.

    I think you are correct on Cain & Bachmann as well.

  19. Freddy Ardanza Says:

    T-Bored raised less than 5 M according to NYT

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/us/politics/01donate.html?_r=1

  20. asparagus Says:

    Huntsman has a major inferiority complex when it comes to Romney. Now he’s firing off at Meg Whitman for calling him a politician. The guy is going to flake out. He’s running in the wrong cycle. I hope Utah moves its primary up so Huntsman can get his ambitious nose rubbed in it.

  21. Heath Says:

    And that pissed me off too Matt.

  22. Matt "MWS" Says:

    That Times article in #19 indicates Paul is only looking at 4-5 million.

    It’s a pretty tough quarter all the way around.

  23. Matt "MWS" Says:

    Heath,

    Well, at least you’re consistent. :-)

  24. Matt C Says:

    MWS,

    I think that Times article is only referring to Paul’s latest moneybomb on his website, though. Go to ronpaul2012.com and you’ll see he raised $4.5 million in the last week alone. He had two additional money bombs this quarter that raised over a million each, so he’ll have at least $6.5 million when all is said and done.

  25. Pool Shark Says:

    Thought Huntsman was running a positive, above the fray campaign. Guess not.
    http://gop12.thehill.com/2011/07/huntsman-team-rips-meg-whitman.html

  26. Pool Shark Says:

    Oh, I forgot. It’s ok for Huntsman to attack Republicans, but not Democrats. Got it.

  27. Pool Shark Says:

    Democrats get love letters from Huntsman.
    http://www.jonhuntsman.com

  28. mac Says:

    It’s been awhile since I’ve listened to talk radio, how are Rush and the gang treating Bachmann?

  29. bob Says:

    #28:

    The cat’s meow.

  30. mac Says:

    29. That explains a lot.

  31. marK Says:

    Pool.26

    A very good point, but hardly surprising when you consider that Huntsman is the media’s candidate for the GOP nomination.

  32. asparagus Says:

    How will everyone be celebrating Quitters Day on Sunday? Personally, I am planning on starting a home improvement project and then giving up midway through. Sarah has been an inspiration to us all and I am looking forward to her next book: “Not Afraid to Quit”.

  33. mac Says:

    Given what talk radio is doing for Bachmann’s poll numbers it makes Huckabee’s strength in polls even more impressive because Mike never got any love from Rush and the gang.

  34. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    Ronald Reagan’s conditions of deploying American combat troops:

    “1. The United States should not commit its forces to military action overseas unless the cause is vital to our national interest.

    “2. If the decision is made to commit our forces to combat abroad, it must be done with the clear intent and support needed to win. It should not be a halfway or tentative commitment, and there must be clearly defined and realistic objectives.

    “3. Before we commit our troops to combat, there must be reasonable assurance that the cause we are fighting for and the actions we take will have the support of the American people and Congress.

    “4. Even after all these other tests are met, our troops should be committed to combat abroad only as a last resort, when no other choice is available.”

    http://www.rollcall.com/issues/56_147/pascoe_reagan_to_mccain__youre_wrong_about_libya-206865-1.html

    So in other words, Reagan would not have gone in to Libya.

  35. Max Twain Says:

    Ron Paul announced 4.5m raised.

  36. Ci2Eye Says:

    Impressive for Huntsman but didn’t I read somewhere that Romney and one other candidate had filed an extension and won’t be reporting their numbers immediately. Does anyone know anything about that?

  37. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    Bristol says Bachmann stealing Palin’s style

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/bthesite/the-ridiculous-report-blog/bal-bristol-palin-says-bachmann-ripping-off-her-moms-style-20110701,0,6517406.story

  38. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    36

    No, the extensions are for personal disclosures, not fundraising http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/06/ceo-6-27-2011.html

  39. Matt C Says:

    Max (35), that announcement was from a non-affiliated Facebook page, and was announcing the total for their last week moneybomb. A Ron Paul spokesman has told ABC News that they will announce a total higher than $4.5 for the second quarter.

    See the update at the bottom of this article:
    http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/07/ron-paul-raises-45-million-in-2nd-fiscal-quarter-of-2011.html

  40. Ci2Eye Says:

    #38,

    Thanks Massachusetts Conservative. That’s what I remember seeing.

  41. Smack1968 Says:

    Massachusetts Conservative,

    On a more serious note…well..not really I guess…

    ….If you compare the husbands of the two lady’s, Palin wins in a route.

    At least we don’t have tapes of Todd Palin calling gays Barbarians…like Marcus Bachmann does.

    What a circus.

    If Bachmann wins the AMES Straw Poll I might have to be banned at RACE42012 for impersonating a GOP voter.

    A Bachmann victory at AMES tells me out of touch with my party…i don’t really belong…. and I’m a Social Conservative.

    :(

  42. Massachusetts Conservative Says:

    41

    I’m losing faith in the future of our party too Smack. If Romney and Pawlenty are deemed unacceptable to some folks, we’re doomed.

  43. marK Says:

    Smack,

    Patience is a virtue, my friend. Bachmann has all the classic signs of being a flare candidate. She will have her moment in the sun. Can she withstand the scrutiny?

    I wouldn’t bet on it.

  44. Joshua Says:

    I wouldn’t recommend putting any of these unofficial announcement numbers on the fundraising leaderboard. It’s only the numbers reported on the official reports to the FEC that we can trust, because the campaign could be in legal trouble if they misreport those numbers. By contrast, there’s no penalty for leaking inaccurate numbers to the media.

    It’s sort of like how Anthony Weiner was happy to tell reporters that his Twitter account had been hacked, but he wasn’t willing to ask the Capitol Police or FBI to investigate. Why not? Because he knew that filing a false police report would be illegal.

  45. PabloZed Says:

    43

    I disagree. These last couple elections cycles are made for the Bachmanns of the world – candidates who can move crowds, bring in cash, and bring voters to the polls. What she lacksat this time is organization on the ground in Iowa.

    But it baffles me that the GOP nomination is a fight between Romney and Bachmann. Pawlenty is fading and is basically broke. And forget comparing him to McCain who had personal money. Pawlenty can’t bankroll his campaign. He could be out after Ames.
    If Bachmann can win Iowa and Romney hold onto NH, it will be a two person race between two people who should not come anywhere near the presidency. Its depressing.

  46. Ci2Eye Says:

    #41 and #42,

    I would second your emotion. I used to be a conservative Republican but now I think you’d call me a moderate Republican yet I haven’t changed my positions on the issues. The party has simply shifted decidedly rightward.

    If one looks as it as a range that went from 1 to 20 with 20 being most conservative and 1 being least, I was about a 16. But now Republicans have shifted the range and anything below 10 is considered liberal and has dropped off. The new top end is 30 which is territory once occupied by the Libertarians. I’m still a 16 but inteaad of being a upper end conservative, I’m now towards the bottom and find people calling me a RINO.

    I am beginning to understand how Reagan must’ve felt when he said he didn’t leave the Democrat Party but rather, they left him. Republicans, propelled by the Tea Party, are moving to a hard-core right and leaving me behind. When Democrats, made their leftward lurch in the 60s and 70s, it gave rise to the Reagan Democrat and they nearly destroyed the party.

    Republicans need to be very careful with their idealogy shift because they could find themselves without the more educated and wealthy members of the party that have historically been crucial to their success and instead left only with the rural, white, less educated, blue collar voters. With only this group, Republicans won’t have the financial resources to fuel their campaigns or enough members to win.

  47. Matt P. Says:

    Tim Pawlenty will have pawlenty of time on his hands after his campaign implodes for lack of pawlenty of cash.

  48. Smack1968 Says:

    A good spin job by the TPAW camp.

    “Gov. Pawlenty will report that his campaign has raised about $4.2 million, and begins the third quarter with more available cash-on-hand than the Republicans who won the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary had in July 2007.”

    It looks like TPAW will have enough cash to go all out for an AMES victory if he can raise some extra ching in the month of July.

    MISSION: TPAW AMES VICTORY!!

  49. Jaxemer11 Says:

    48 – Only because he hasn’t paid his bills yet.

  50. | Race 4 2012 Says:

    [...] to reveal the breakdown of primary vs. general election money, but luckily our very own Smack posted some campaign info a few days ago showing Pawlenty raised $1.5 million for the general election. [...]

Leave a Reply

State of the Race


Obama Approval


Support R4'12

Meta

Recent Posts

Buy This Book

Categories

Archives

Search

Blogroll

Site Syndication

Main