Romney Up 5%!! Huck and T-Paw only up 1%, Sarah and Newt only up 2%.
And with the overlapping polling dates that means Mitt had a VERY good week, and is poised to be even higher next time.
C4Huck . . . you seem to have blinders on (again) in that Romney only has a 2% “strongly unfavorable” rating as well (like you’re main squeeze, Huck). They’re all here on this site too, I guess?
Smack . . . wow, do we actually have an outspoken TPaw fan on this site here? You’d be the first that I know of, and he’ll need a lot more than you my friend, but the debating should be fun. I still think we’re looking for someone who is actually a hard core fan of Newt on this site, so TPaw hasn’t been alone. How do you expect to defend T-Paw’s quote of “The era of small government is over” my friend? I just chuckle that he thinks he’s now a “Tea-Partier/”Tea-Paw” when his record and quotes do not jive with that at all. Romney took plenty of heat for this last time, and T-Paw should too.
[...] I honestly have no idea why anyone would take you seriously. Not only is your name recognition a blip – not even a blip, more like Blip Lite – but your gubernatorial career reads like a [...]
[...] I honestly have no idea why anyone would take you seriously. Not only is your name recognition a blip – not even a blip, more like Blip Lite – but your gubernatorial career reads like a [...]
March 29th, 2011 at 5:04 pm
It’s getting intense
Mike Huckabee:
Strongly Favorable = 27%
Strongly Unfavorable = 2% ..all here at Race42012!
March 29th, 2011 at 5:06 pm
Good news for Palin fans. Her numbers are finally going up instead of down.
March 29th, 2011 at 5:10 pm
And people are still denying Huckabees relevance…
Huckabee 2012!
March 29th, 2011 at 5:17 pm
Palin and Huck at 97% and 90% (up a tick for each) recognizability respectively.
That’s pretty well known, great for Huck, dismally high for Palin because of lack of room to change this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/13/fav-palin_n_725513.html
March 29th, 2011 at 5:22 pm
When will the overall favorables come out?
March 29th, 2011 at 5:23 pm
2.
Mark,
Our big four this week..
Huck +1
Mitt +4 ..congrats!
Newt +4 ..congrats!
Palin -1
March 29th, 2011 at 5:36 pm
HUCK = 90% NAME ID
TPAW = 40% NAME ID
HUCK = 27 FAV – 2 UNFAV = 25 Intensity
TPAW = 16 FAV – 0 UNFAV = 16 Intensity
What happens when TPAW NAME ID reaches 80%?….28-32%? heeheeh
I’ll tell ya….
Iowa victory!
Pawlenty/Rubio 2012
March 29th, 2011 at 5:42 pm
I just wish T-Paw could be just a little more intense.
Why is his recognizabilty numbers stuck on 40 and about the only one dropping?
Let’s go, Tim!!!
March 29th, 2011 at 5:43 pm
http://polltracker.talkingpointsmemo.com/contests/us-favorability-pawlenty
March 29th, 2011 at 9:11 pm
ROMNEY-BOOM!!!
Romney Up 5%!! Huck and T-Paw only up 1%, Sarah and Newt only up 2%.
And with the overlapping polling dates that means Mitt had a VERY good week, and is poised to be even higher next time.
C4Huck . . . you seem to have blinders on (again) in that Romney only has a 2% “strongly unfavorable” rating as well (like you’re main squeeze, Huck). They’re all here on this site too, I guess?
Smack . . . wow, do we actually have an outspoken TPaw fan on this site here? You’d be the first that I know of, and he’ll need a lot more than you my friend, but the debating should be fun. I still think we’re looking for someone who is actually a hard core fan of Newt on this site, so TPaw hasn’t been alone. How do you expect to defend T-Paw’s quote of “The era of small government is over” my friend? I just chuckle that he thinks he’s now a “Tea-Partier/”Tea-Paw” when his record and quotes do not jive with that at all. Romney took plenty of heat for this last time, and T-Paw should too.
March 29th, 2011 at 9:16 pm
Jeff,
“How do you expect to defend T-Paw’s quote of “The era of small government is over” my friend?”
This coming from a supporter of Mr. “Don’t tie me to Reagan/Bush, I was an independent during Reagan/Bush”?
Seriously????
March 29th, 2011 at 9:40 pm
Craig.6,
I was talking overall. Not the little bumps and sags. She has gone up two points since February.
March 29th, 2011 at 11:32 pm
Positive intensity surveys are also known as “voodoo pollonomics”.
March 30th, 2011 at 9:27 pm
MWS . . . wow between your comments on the Michigan thread and this one it is clear you’re in a very bad mood. I guess I’ll cut you some slack.
Why do you think I followed my comment up with “ROMNEY TOOK PLENTY OF HEAT FOR THIS LAST TIME, AND T-PAW SHOULD TOO.” ?!?!?!?
Or were you incapable of any comprehesion once you envisioned “HYPOCRITE!” in your mind?
Chill man . . .
July 18th, 2011 at 7:12 pm
[...] I honestly have no idea why anyone would take you seriously. Not only is your name recognition a blip – not even a blip, more like Blip Lite – but your gubernatorial career reads like a [...]
July 21st, 2011 at 3:33 am
[...] I honestly have no idea why anyone would take you seriously. Not only is your name recognition a blip – not even a blip, more like Blip Lite – but your gubernatorial career reads like a [...]