CNN/Opinion Research 2012 Republican Presidential Nomination Survey
I’m going to read you the names of a few people who might run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012. For each one, please tell me whether you would be very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not likely at all to support them if they decided to run for the Republican nomination in 2012.
MIKE HUCKABEE
- Very likely 27%
- Somewhat likely 40%
- Not very likely 20%
- Not likely at all 11%
Among Republicans
- Very likely 30%
- Somewhat likely 39%
- Not very likely 20%
- Not likely at all 12%
Among Independents
- Very likely 24%
- Somewhat likely 42%
- Not very likely 19%
- Not likely at all 11%
Among Conservatives
- Very likely 33%
- Somewhat likely 41%
- Not very likely 17%
- Not likely at all 8%
Among Moderates
- Very likely 17%
- Somewhat likely 44%
- Not very likely 23%
- Not likely at all 12%
MITT ROMNEY
- Very likely 24%
- Somewhat likely 35%
- Not very likely 25%
- Not likely at all 15%
Among Republicans
- Very likely 26%
- Somewhat likely 37%
- Not very likely 25%
- Not likely at all 10%
Among Independents
- Very likely 22%
- Somewhat likely 32%
- Not very likely 25%
- Not likely at all 19%
Among Conservatives
- Very likely 28%
- Somewhat likely 34%
- Not very likely 26%
- Not likely at all 11%
Among Moderates
- Very likely 19%
- Somewhat likely 35%
- Not very likely 25%
- Not likely at all 18%
NEWT GINGRICH
- Very likely 19%
- Somewhat likely 35%
- Not very likely 22%
- Not likely at all 22%
Among Republicans
- Very likely 17%
- Somewhat likely 40%
- Not very likely 22%
- Not likely at all 18%
Among Independents
- Very likely 21%
- Somewhat likely 30%
- Not very likely 21%
- Not likely at all 25%
Among Conservatives
- Very likely 21%
- Somewhat likely 41%
- Not very likely 22%
- Not likely at all 14%
Among Moderates
- Very likely 18%
- Somewhat likely 27%
- Not very likely 24%
- Not likely at all 29%
SARAH PALIN
- Very likely 23%
- Somewhat likely 26%
- Not very likely 23%
- Not likely at all 28%
Among Republicans
- Very likely 28%
- Somewhat likely 32%
- Not very likely 21%
- Not likely at all 19%
Among Independents
- Very likely 18%
- Somewhat likely 20%
- Not very likely 24%
- Not likely at all 38%
Among Conservatives
- Very likely 28%
- Somewhat likely 30%
- Not very likely 24%
- Not likely at all 17%
Among Moderates
- Very likely 12%
- Somewhat likely 17%
- Not very likely 22%
- Not likely at all 50%
Survey of 470 Republicans and Republican-leaning Independents was conducted December 17-19, 2010. The margin of error is +/- 4.5 percentage points.
December 28th, 2010 at 11:31 am
WOO HOO!!
December 28th, 2010 at 11:34 am
Why is it that in the detail pages, in the section that breaks down the results by region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West), only the South has percentages listed, whereas the other three are “N/A”?
December 28th, 2010 at 11:37 am
…support them if they decided to run for the Republican nomination in 2012:
Huck } Likely = 67%
! Unlikely = 31%
Palin } Likely = 49% Unlikely = 51%
December 28th, 2010 at 11:44 am
Glad to see Huckabee doing well in another poll.
December 28th, 2010 at 11:45 am
Hamaca,
The South was the only region in which the sample was of sufficient size to render statistically relevant data; and even the +/- 7% MoE for the South is relatively high and of limited value.
December 28th, 2010 at 12:20 pm
Here is the problem with these numbers for Huckabee and Romney fans. As Craig loves to remind us it really is all about early state momentum, so all Palin has to do is convince a plurality of voters in IA and SC to vote for her, she doesn’t need 50%+1 she just needs 1 more than #2 and she has the Mo. If she can get even half of that 49% in those 2 states and the others split then you are looking at Sarah Goldwater or Barry Palin come November 2012.
December 28th, 2010 at 12:53 pm
Ray,
If Romney fans want to vote for Huck in Iowa and South Carolina to help nudge Palin out of the race even sooner than Florida or Super Tuesday, I’m all fine with that.
December 28th, 2010 at 12:53 pm
…support them if they decided to run for the Republican nomination in 2012:
Huck } Very likely = 27%
! .. Not very likely = 20% 
Palin } Very likely = 23% ……… Not very likely = 23%
Rom } Very likely = 24% ……… Not very likely = 25%
AND the “I kinda like you” % versus the “I’m not in to you at all” %
Huck 40/11
Mitty 35/15
Newt 35/22
Palin 26/28
December 28th, 2010 at 1:08 pm
Seems like Newt Gingrich is a dark horse? Where would all his support go to if he decides not to run? And is he really running? Why isn’t this post on rightosphere? I though race420XX became rightosphere?
Thanks,
Deg
December 28th, 2010 at 1:22 pm
Deg,
Someone should poll that question concerning Newt’s supporters 2nd choice.
We do know from previous polling that Palin’s go mostly to Huck and vice versa.
The answer for me is that Newt has quite a bit higher favorables among conservatives than Romney, therefore they go to Mike & Sarah about evenly. But Newt certainly takes away some of Mitt’s “old white man vote” at this early stage. Btw, Newt is going to get hammered by the Republcan women vote as the campaign heats up, imo. I think the liberal media will be all over him daily, kinda like the pounding Barbour is receiving from them now but for other reasons.
December 28th, 2010 at 1:24 pm
*Republican*
December 28th, 2010 at 2:15 pm
Well, it would be unreasonable to think that all of Newt support would go to Mitt, but if it were to split 40/30/30 — would that be enough to put Mitt over the top.
We should definitely have a who would be your second choice after Newt to understand future tendencies. As far as I can remember from 2008, all the speculation was almost worth nothing except for political strategic planning.
John McCain & Rudy Guiliani were #1, then John McCain plummeted and resurfaced… while Mitt was steadily climbing until Iowa shocker.
I’m not much of a predictor… but I think or hope that Newt staggers, Palin and Huck cancel eachother or team up against Mitt. With Mitt victorious despite all Odds, this would be no easy task… and there will be one low name profile building up credibility for the next cycle. Most likely Tim Pawlenty or similar.
December 28th, 2010 at 2:28 pm
Mitt needs a huge field to split up all conservative voters or he’s kinda toast, running as the moderate RomneyCare architect candidate.
The problem is, the conservative vote is growing and will be HUGE this cycle as a counter to an incumbent liberal like Obama of ObamaCare fame.
December 28th, 2010 at 2:28 pm
When it comes to polls like this, I only have TWO words to say RUDY 2008
December 28th, 2010 at 2:28 pm
Mitch is still trying to walk the horse back into the barn. His “truce” statement was apparently meant for liberals:
http://www.lifenews.com/2010/12/28/mitch-daniels-truce-directed-at-liberals-not-for-social-conservatives/
December 28th, 2010 at 2:30 pm
Or three words: Romney IOWA 2008
December 28th, 2010 at 2:30 pm
Craig says:
Mitt needs a huge field to split up all conservative voters or he’s kinda toast, running as the moderate RomneyCare architect candidate.
The problem is, the conservative vote is growing and will be HUGE this cycle as a counter to an incumbent liberal like Obama of ObamaCare fam
————————————————————————
Wishful thinking, a True conservative could never vote for Huckabee…
Just remember how badly Huckabee did after Iowa, especially in New Hampshire….
December 28th, 2010 at 2:35 pm
Matt,
Mitch must have got yet another “wake up, what are ya doin’?” phone call from his pal, Huck.
He’s sure spinning.
December 28th, 2010 at 2:41 pm
17.
Thunder,
Some friendly advice… You had better start avoiding EVERY poll then from now on. Huck’s kicking Mitt’s butt among TRUE CONSERVATIVES up and down the Midwest, South, and even in the National polls.
Did you miss yesterday’s Florida and NC polls, too? Same thing: Conservatives Love Huck!
!!
December 28th, 2010 at 2:44 pm
Some friendly advice… You had better start avoiding EVERY poll then from now on. Huck’s kicking Mitt’s butt among TRUE CONSERVATIVES up and down the Midwest, South, and even in the National polls.
Did you miss yesterday’s Florida and NC polls, too? Same thing: Conservatives Love Huck!
!!
===================================================================================
As someone else said, it was an outlier. As one who lives in Florida, Romney does best except in the Pan Handle. It also suggest that Romney supporters take more Christmas vacations than Huckabee.
How could any call himself a Huckabee supporter and disregard his record on law and order and taxes….
* Huckabee claimed that a speech in which he implored the state Legislature to raise taxes was in response to a state Supreme Court order to increase education funding. But he specifically said in that speech that he would address the education matter at a later date.
* He said a tax on beds filled in nursing homes was a “fee” not a tax, despite the fact that he himself has called it the “bed tax.”
* Huckabee claimed a gasoline tax was only passed after 80 percent of voters approved it. Not true. The tax was enacted before a referendum vote on highway repairs.
* He frequently says he cut taxes “almost 94 times” but leaves out the 21 taxes raised during his tenure. In the end, he presided over a net tax increase.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/huckabees_fiscal_record.html
And lets not forget all the criminals he let out of Prison. Doesn’t sound very conservative to me.
December 28th, 2010 at 2:47 pm
Asked if the truce “wasn’t anything to alarm social conservatives” he responded, “First of all, it wasn’t directed to them. It was directed as much to people who…
===
As much? Really?
The more Mitch trys to explain the “truce”, the deeper trouble he gets into, imo.
December 28th, 2010 at 2:58 pm
Thunder,
Perhaps unlike you, folks in today’s CNN poll and yesterday’s NC & FL duo polls(Among FL Conservatives = Mike Huckabee 75% / 14% .. Among NC Conservatives = Mike Huckabee 79% / 9% ) plus almost every single one at Fox Business News including Neil Cavuto of Fox News support Huck for his TRUE CONSERVATIVE RECORD & POLICIES:
PLUS Mike Huckabee calls for living within our means (a balanced budget amendment), The Fair Tax (to turn this economy around short term and long term once and for all), term limits (no more career politicians – 12 years max and go home.
MIKE WORKED WITH the Democrat majority in Arkansas and still balanced the budget for over 10 straight years while governing: building roads, infrastructure and improving quality of education for all children. His state was vastly improved and higher ranked in all these areas when he left office with a high approval rating in the 60s. Who can top that?
- Doubled the child care tax credit in 1997.
- Eliminated the capital gains tax on sale of a home.
- Indexed Arkansas’ state income tax to inflation, keeping people from being pushed into higher tax brackets.
- Cut taxes nearly 100 times in his state.
- Eliminated the state income tax for families below poverty level.
- Left his state with almost $1 billion surplus, a state record.
- Cut welfare rolls by 50 %.
- Balanced the state budget of Arkansas every year he was governor in Arkansas.
- Led efforts to establish the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights and a Property Taxpayer Bill of Rights for uniform notice and due process.
- Plus he made the interstate road system in Arkansas one of the best in the nation, where it had been among the worst, bringing in more trucking and trade. And the small tax the voters raised was repealed once the roads were complete.
PLUS: CarrIed out 16 executions in his time as governor of Arkansas which refutes his opponents’ claims that he’s soft on crime.
- Signed a ban on partial birth abortion.
- Worked to grant school administrators more flexibility in hiring and firing poor teachers.
- Moved Arkansas from grade “F” to a “C” in Charitable Choice compliance so Arkansas was only one of twelve states to pass.
All this accomplished by Governor Huckabee while facing a legislature with 89 Democrats out of 100 legislators in the House and only four Republicans in the 35-seat Senate.
Yet, Huckabee found a way to govern, and as I said above, left the state with amazing high approval ratings that still exist to this very day.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:02 pm
And do you really want to get into a debate of raising FEES VERSUS TAXES?
December 28th, 2010 at 3:02 pm
Wow…
Craig spams yet another post. Does your diet mainly consist of energy drinks?
December 28th, 2010 at 3:04 pm
And why Romney’s approvals were down in the 30′s – his final year as a one term governor?
I didn’t think so.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:06 pm
Pete,
Thunders’s post “#20 Spam” preceeded my counterpost with Mike’s true record.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:08 pm
*preceded*
December 28th, 2010 at 3:10 pm
Out of 27 posts (including this one), you’ve got 15, Craig. More than 50% of the posts here are yours.
That is what I call Spamming a post.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:13 pm
Each day, same story. New polls come out where Romney’s not in first and it “MUST BE AN OULIER!”
Or a conspiracy!
December 28th, 2010 at 3:14 pm
Pete,
I guess folks are out spending their gift cards. How ’bout you?
December 28th, 2010 at 3:16 pm
If this CNN poll had Romney first and let’s say.. Huck last, we’d have 179 comments by now.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:26 pm
# Craig Says:
December 28th, 2010 at 3:02 pm
And do you really want to get into a debate of raising FEES VERSUS TAXES?
============================================================================
You mean Huckabee kicking grandma out on the street by raising the price of beds at retirements homes, very Christian of him….
And yes, I would be glad to talk about the difference between raising the price of a street sign versus raise taxes on Grandma…..
December 28th, 2010 at 3:27 pm
craig says:
- Cut taxes nearly 100 times in his state.
=============================================
Fact Check time: He frequently says he cut taxes “almost 94 times” but leaves out the 21 taxes raised during his tenure. In the end, he presided over a net tax increase.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:28 pm
Craig says:
Left his state with almost $1 billion surplus, a state record.
===============================================================
by raising taxes of course… Not very conservative to me.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:29 pm
Craig says:
CarrIed out 16 executions in his time as governor of Arkansas which refutes his opponents’ claims that he’s soft on crime.
============================================================================
Are you including executions by the criminals he let out of Prison. Including the 4 police officers in Washington or the rape and murder in Missiori.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:31 pm
Huckabee’s ad says he was “tough on crime” and “brought Arkansas’ crime rates down.” But that’s not quite right. While the overall crime rate did decline by 3.9%, that was due entirely to a 5.0% reduction in property crimes, such as burglaries and auto theft. When it comes to violent crimes, a category that includes murders, rapes, robberies and aggravated assaults, Huckabee’s record is mixed: Murders and robberies declined, while rapes and aggravated assaults increased. Overall, the violent crime rate was actually 5.2% higher than in 1996, when he took office.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:03 pm
Matt,
I didn’t bother to read your article (you’re welcome) but all I’ve seen Daniels do is defend his comment. Is he really now trying to spin it? Why would he do that? Does he think his best shot is a win in IA? He should just stick to his guns and go for a NH win or very strong second and become the story going into NV and SC.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:42 pm
PPP:
“Sarah Palin’s average favorability in the Bush/Obama states of Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, and Virginia that are most likely essential to Republican chances of retaking the White House is 36/56. Democrats can only hope…”
Here are Palin’s state by state favorability numbers:
State
Favorability
Montana
44/50
Ohio
37/52
North Carolina
36/57
Florida
36/57
Virginia
35/58
Wisconsin
35/58
Minnesota
35/60
Michigan
34/60
Alaska
33/58 …where they know her best. Wake up, folks!!!
Massachusetts
27/68
December 28th, 2010 at 4:46 pm
I’d like to see Huck’s and Mitt’s numbers compared to Palin from these same states in #38…
December 28th, 2010 at 4:51 pm
# Craig Says:
I’d like to see Huck’s and Mitt’s numbers compared to Palin from these same states in #38
===================================================================
Lets face it, it will be the Mike and Mitt show, all others are pretenders.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Well, at least you’ve got the names in the right order, TO.
That’s fantastic forward progress for a hardcore Rombot from Huck’s home state of Florida.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:27 pm
Craig Says:
December 28th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Well, at least you’ve got the names in the right order, TO.
That’s fantastic forward progress for a hardcore Rombot from Huck’s home state of Florida.
=========================================================
Just my way to ease the pain before Huckabee goes down in flames
December 28th, 2010 at 5:39 pm
From GOP 12 …
SARAH PALIN:
December 2008
67% Republicans said they were “very” or “somewhat likely” to support Sarah Palin for the nomination.
December 2010
49% said they were “very” or “somewhat likely” to support Sarah Palin for the nomination.
Note: That’s an 18% drop!!!
December 28th, 2010 at 5:39 pm
MIKE HUCKABEE:
December 2008: 65% Republicans said they were “very” or “somewhat likely” to support Mike Huckabee for the nomination.
December 2010: 67% of Republicans said they were “very” or “somewhat likely” to support Mike Huckabee for the nomination.
Note: That’s a 2% jump.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:42 pm
42. .Huck’s not the one pulling a “Rudy” in Florida
Romney’s support collapses in Florida – Gop12
It’s not quite Rudy Giuliani-bad yet, but Mitt Romney has been sinking further and further in Florida, according to Public Policy Polling.
In March, he led Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin in a 3-person race by 31% and 34%, respectively.
In July, PPP added Newt Gingrich to the polling, and that cut Romney’s lead to just 8% over Palin and Newt.
In October, his lead dipped to just 6%.
And now, he’s actually losing to Mike Huckabee by 2%.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:21 pm
They way they ask this question, what does it even mean? If you add up the totals, you’ll find that 229% of those polled will either very likely, or somewhat likely ‘support’ one or more than on of the top tier candidates. Wow, that’s a pretty big percentage!
What if we only look at those that are
somewhat likely to support the candidates; that yields 136%. It’s pretty obvious that people are indicating that they are likely to support, and also somewhat likely to support several candidates at a time. It’s pretty worthless. When will pollsters ever figure out how to phrase a question to make it meaningful?
December 28th, 2010 at 6:43 pm
Internals…
Support Likely/Support Unlikely
MIKE HUCKABEE
Among Republicans } 69/32 ..+37
Among Independents } 66/30 ..+36
Among Conservatives } 74/25 ..+49
Among THE Moderates } 61/35 ..+26
- CNN/Opinion Research 2012 (12/28/10)
December 28th, 2010 at 6:44 pm
Support Likely/Support Unlikely
SARAH PALIN
Among Republicans } 60/40 ..+20
Among Independents } 38/62 ..-24!!!
Among Conservatives } 58/41 ..+17
Among THE Moderates } 29/72 ..-43!!!
- CNN/Opinion Research 2012 (12/28/10)
December 28th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
Support Likely/Support Unlikely
NEWT GINGRICH
Among Republicans } 57/40 ..+17
Among Independents } 51/46 ..+5
Among Conservatives } 62/36 ..+24
Among THE Moderates } 45/53 ..-8
- CNN/Opinion Research 2012 (12/28/10)
December 28th, 2010 at 6:51 pm
TEST ..playing with my brand new gadget here. Where did Mitt’s numbers go?
December 28th, 2010 at 6:53 pm
Here’s Mitts…
Among Republicans } 63/35 ..+28
Among Independents } 54/44 ..+10
Among Conservatives } 62/37 ..+25
Among THE Moderates } 54/43 ..+11
- CNN/Opinion Research 2012 (12/28/10)
December 28th, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Craig, I took your facts about Huckabee and made a blog about it. Please check it out:
http://ilikemikehuckabee2012.blogspot.com/2010/12/fast-facts-on-gov-mike-huckabee.html
December 28th, 2010 at 7:06 pm
Very nice site, TC. You are so prepared for the next two looooong years!
!
December 28th, 2010 at 7:11 pm
What if Romney Decides Not to Run? http://bit.ly/fJ2bKd via @hotairblog 11 minutes ago · reply
====
Isn’t Hot Air and Malkin where most Palin fans hang out?
I don’t think they care for Mike and Mitt over there. Oh well, too bad for them.
December 28th, 2010 at 7:21 pm
“K-Lo, a Romney fan of longstanding, thinks the unthinkable at NRO. And the Conservatives 4 Palin people are all over it:
Given that his path to the nomination is impossible unless Mike Huckabee runs, something no serious person believes will happen…”
===
Ok, I’m banning myself from further reading over at Hot Air, Malkin, and C4P. They are ALL smoking some extremely strong stuff over on those sites.
I’ll let NRO slide this time.
But Palin is nuts if she thinks both Mike and Mitt are steppin’ aside.
December 28th, 2010 at 7:25 pm
Now I know the locations where TEX, Christie, and the Wingnut fellow are getting thoroughly brainwashed.
December 28th, 2010 at 7:25 pm
I notice that no one has responded to how stupid this question even is.
December 28th, 2010 at 7:27 pm
Oops.. sorry, I think she spells her name *Christy*.
December 28th, 2010 at 7:48 pm
Rasmussen: Voters Still Pin Bad Economy on Bush – 50% blame GWB; 42% say problems caused by President Obama’s policies http://t.co/rV7A9hd about 1 hour ago · reply
====
Well, that’s not good for us. At all.
That is, blaming the Republican President 50-42.
I think the Americans are being much too kind to Obama’s economic policies.
Well, at least we know they overwhelmingly dislike ObamaCare’s mandates, subsidies, and exchanges. And that’s a massive costly takeover by big government. Period. We shall hopefully win on that plus pushing the deficit issue out front by calling for a Balanced Budget Amendment.
And tax reform.
December 28th, 2010 at 8:36 pm
Craig,
Since Nov 9 of this year there were 29 PPP state polls,
go to hucksarmy.com and check for yourself.
Sarahcuda Palin was The Winner 12 times and came 2nd 9 times.
21 times out of 29 polls!!!
She beats Huckster,Romney is distant 3rd and Newt is in the dust.
Remember,first things FIRST! THE NOMINATION!!!
After the nomination Sarahcuda will mop the floor with Obama’s
big ears.
December 28th, 2010 at 8:42 pm
Too bad she’s not running.
December 28th, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Unless Palin is determined to lose in embarrassing fashion by 15 points to Obama.
And if you’re going to count states twice or more, let’s add up the entire 2010 PPP chart at Huck’s Army to be fair to Romney.
Huck } 1st or MOE of 1st: 36 of 66 polls
Romney } 1st or MOE of 1st: 36 of 66 polls
AND
Obama’s dream opponent, Palin } 1st or MOE of 1st: 35 of 66 polls
December 28th, 2010 at 9:18 pm
Gingrich, Palin have no shot at being GOP presidential nominee – Jay Bookman http://t.co/o9f07Z0 21 minutes ago · reply
===
Palin, for sure has no shot if she’s still double digits back in the polls to Obama this summer. Which she will be, imo.
Newt’s still got an outside chance (about 10%)if Huck falters in Iowa and SC to him. 10:1 odds say Huck wins both before Newt does.
December 28th, 2010 at 9:23 pm
Craig,
The whole year???Fair enough,I won’t count
and see if you twisted the numbers again
because polls last winter,spring and summer
don’t matter.
But 29 polls in the last month and a half
show clearly what’s happening.
And Sarahcuda is the clear WINNER!
Craig,being an old friend,here’s friendly
advice:
Deal with it or you will go nuts!
December 28th, 2010 at 9:28 pm
[...] been a flurry of Public Policy Presidential polling as well as the latest CNN poll. What does it all [...]
December 28th, 2010 at 9:46 pm
Iowa
SC
FL
Bye-bye, Sarah! Enjoy reality tv.
December 28th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
Poll Watch: PPP (D) Florida 2012 GOP Primary
PPP (D) Florida 2012 GOP Primary
•Mike Huckabee 23% {15%} [15%] (21%)
•Mitt Romney 21% {28%} [31%] (52%)
•Newt Gingrich 18% {15%} [23%]
•Sarah Palin 13% {22%} [23%] (18%)
December 28th, 2010 at 9:54 pm
And that’s a huge problem for Palin. Period.
And in Iowa, she’s waaaaaay behind Huck with three different polling companies:
21 to 11
21 to 12
27 to 17
December 28th, 2010 at 9:56 pm
Poor Nikki Haley, having both Romney and Palin pounding on her door begging for her endorsement.
Who gets it?
Huck will get the endorsement from the three “good old boys” that Nikki beat in SC.
!
December 28th, 2010 at 10:01 pm
TEX,
Just for you. Click on the chart it to enlarge.
http://forum.hucksarmy.com/download/file.php?id=1393
December 28th, 2010 at 10:53 pm
Corrupt,Good old boys did really great.
Thanks to Sarahcuda Nikky Haley mopped
the floor with three worthless amigos.
December 28th, 2010 at 11:01 pm
As long as you keep “forgetting”
I have to remind you.
National polls two years before
election are meaningless and waste
of time.
Ask Presidents Giuliani and Hillary.
First things FIRST,THE NOMINATION!
Only after Sarah gets the nomination
we will go to faze two:
Will RINOS vote for Palin or Chicago
community organizer.
Who do you think they would choose?
December 28th, 2010 at 11:54 pm
But Romney has a legitimate claim to Nikki’s endorsement.
1. He endorsed her 1st
2. She endorsed him last time
3. Two mama grizzlies is one too many
December 28th, 2010 at 11:57 pm
Maybe she’ll endorse Palin & Mitt each 50%.
And Huck will receive 100% from the three good old boys from the primary.
I love SC! 8)!
December 29th, 2010 at 12:52 am
I could care less who endorse who.
The only reason Nikky Haley came from
dead last 4th place to #1 is because of
Sarahcuda.
All the people that voted for Nikky,
did so because of Sarah.
Everyone of them will vote for Sarah
a woman they admire and love,regardless
of Nikky.
After all,Haley got their votes compliments
of Sarahcuda Palin.
December 29th, 2010 at 12:56 am
“And Huck will receive 100% from the three good old boys from the primary.”
=============================================================================
You mean the three corrupt losers who got
beat senseless by one,only one girl?!
HA,ha,ha……..
December 29th, 2010 at 4:46 am
Uh-oh! Even the Tea Party is jumping off the Palin Bandwagon…
Looking more at the internals of Tuesday’s new CNN Survey…
TEA PARTY SUPPORTERS:
Likely Support/Unlikely Support
Huckabee 72/26 ..+46
Romney 66/33 ..+33
Palin 62/37 ..+25
December 29th, 2010 at 6:54 am
Nikki Hayley is over-rated anyway.
And as far as I know she never even tried to explain why she used to call that weirdo up at 2am, and leave hundreds of texts for him.
I hope she’s a success but she hardly matters. In the entire 2008 campaign the only 2 endorsements that counted were Kennedy & Crist.
December 29th, 2010 at 7:01 am
Palin is actually the antithesis of what the Tea-Party should be all about (focus on the economy not religion etc etc). Palin & her side-kick Beck tried to co-opt the movement but thankfully they seem to have failed.
December 29th, 2010 at 11:17 am
Craig,
You are wasting your time posting push polls favored
here,but not there.Crap here and crap that.
Favored this,not favored that.
The onslaught of all kinds of push polls are concerted
efforts by Libs,LSM,corrupt,spineless GOP establishment,
Bushies and their hacks,flacks,flunkies and lap dogs to
slow down and stop Sarah Palin.
The only effect they had is to suppress her national polls
against Obama,which means nothing two years before election.
True conservatives in both parties admire and love Sarah Palin.
They will give her the nomination.
December 29th, 2010 at 4:11 pm
TEX,
She’s dead last among conservatives. Period.
SARAH PALIN
Among Republicans } 60/40 ..+20
Among Independents } 38/62 ..-24
Among Conservatives } 58/41 ..+17
- CNN/Opinion Research 2012 (12/28/10)
December 29th, 2010 at 4:12 pm
MIKE HUCKABEE
!
Among Republicans } 69/32 ..+37
Among Independents } 66/30 ..+36
Among Conservatives } 74/25 ..+49