November 22, 2010

Jeb!

Quote of the Day:

I am starting to hear rumors that Jeb is telling potential prominent supporters to “keep their powder dry,” meaning not to endorse or support any 2012 candidates until they check back with him.

I really could have done without both of the Bush presidencies that our nation has experienced, but I continue to believe that Jeb is the “good” Bush, and I think the way he governed Florida suggests that as well.  Further, I continue to believe that Dick Armey and the national heads of the Tea Party are going to spend primary season morphing Mitt Romney into Mike Castle.  They’ve tasted the sheer sense of power that comes with knocking off an establishment frontrunner and the temptation to do the same to Romney, with his RomneyCare and his past views on abortion and his perfect hair and aristocratic demeanor, will be just too much to resist.  That leaves Palin as the national version of Christine O’Donnell, or at least Sharron Angle.  In a Romney/Palin race, everyone loses except the Democrats.  And I remain skeptical that retreads like Huckabee and Newt, or yawners like Pawlenty or Daniels, can fill the role of compromise choice.

But Jeb can.

by @ 9:29 pm. Filed under Jeb Bush
Trackback URL for this post:
http://race42012.com/2010/11/22/jeb/trackback/

One Response to “Jeb!”

  1. hamaca Says:

    Not sure what you want me to explain, and I know criticism of Huck is to be expected, but to suggest that there’s any kind of equivalence between advising the GOP not throw themselves from a cliff less than two years before they might actually be able to do something about abortion and a. being pro-choice as a candidate for gov and then pro-life as a candidate for POTUS less than 4 years later and b. making a blanket statement that social issues should take a back seat as a matter of policy is a reality that can only exist in the mind of a partisan.

    Not sure what you want me to explain, and I know criticism of Huck is to be expected, but to suggest that there’s any kind of equivalence between advising the GOP not throw themselves from a cliff less than two years before they might actually be able to do something about abortion and a. being pro-choice as a candidate for gov and then pro-life as a candidate for POTUS less than 4 years later and b. making a blanket statement that social issues should take a back seat as a matter of policy is a reality that can only exist in the mind of a partisan.

Leave a Reply

State of the Race


Obama Approval


Support R4'12

Meta

Recent Posts

Buy This Book

Categories

Archives

Search

Blogroll

Site Syndication

Main