February 24, 2010

Poll Watch: Franklin & Marshall Pennsylvania Senatorial Survey

Franklin & Marshall Pennsylvania Senatorial Survey

Democratic Senatorial Primary

  • Arlen Specter 33% (30%) {30%} [37%] (33%)
  • Joe Sestak 16% (13%) {18%} [11%] (13%)
  • Some other candidate 7% (7%) {5%} [6%] (6%)
  • Don’t know 44% (50%) {47%} [46%] (48%)

Senatorial Election

Among Registered Voters

  • Arlen Specter (D) 33% (30%) {33%} [37%]
  • Pat Toomey (R) 29% (30%) {31%} [29%]
  • Some other candidate 9% (5%) {6%} [9%]
  • Don’t know 29% (35%) {30%} [25%]
  • Pat Toomey (R) 25% (28%) {28%} [26%]
  • Joe Sestak (D) 22% (16%) {20%} [22%]
  • Some other candidate 6% (5%) {4%} [6%]
  • Don’t know 47% (51%) {48%} [46%]

Among Likely Voters

  • Pat Toomey (R) 44% (45%)
  • Arlen Specter (D) 34% (31%)
  • Some other candidate 6% (4%)
  • Don’t know 16% (20%)
  • Pat Toomey (R) 38% (41%)
  • Joe Sestak (D) 20% (19%)
  • Some other candidate 3% (3%)
  • Don’t know 39% (37%)

Favorable / Unfavorable {Net}

  • Bob Casey 33% (32%) {32%} [41%] (32%) / 18% (20%) {21%} [18%] (17%) {+15%}
  • Barack Obama 49% (44%) {45%} [55%] (57%) / 39% (44%) {39%} [37%] (27%) {+10%}
  • Pat Toomey 16% (15%) {16%} [18%] / 7% (7%) {10%} [10%] {+9%}
  • Joe Sestak 10% (8%) {11%} [13%] / 3% (6%) {5%} [4%] {+7%}
  • Ed Rendell 41% (42%) {37%} [32%] (42%) / 44% (45%) {47%} [53%] (40%) {-3%}
  • Arlen Specter 32% (35%) {28%} [35%] (31%) / 45% (43%) {46%} [42%] (37%) {-13%}

How would you rate the way that Arlen Specter is handling his job as U.S. Senator?

  • Excellent job 5% (5%) {4%} [8%] (10%)
  • Good job 25% (29%) {25%} [27%] (24%)
  • Only a fair job 35% (31%) {36%} [35%] (37%)
  • Poor job 27% (27%) {28%} [22%] (18%)

Do you believe that Arlen Specter has done a good enough job as senator to deserve re-election, or do you believe it is time for a change?

  • Deserves re-election 25% (29%) {23%} [34%] (28%)
  • Time for a change 63% (60%) {66%} [54%] (57%)

How would you rate the way that Barack Obama is handling his job as President?

  • Excellent job 12% (11%) {17%} [14%] (20%)
  • Good job 29% (27%) {23%} [33%] (35%)
  • Only a fair job 32% (32%) {31%} [29%] (25%)
  • Poor job 27% (29%) {28%} [24%] (19%)

Do you generally support or oppose the tea party movement?

  • Strongly support 19%
  • Somewhat support 20%
  • Somewhat oppose 8%
  • Strongly oppose 21%

How likely would you be to vote for a candidate who supports the tea party movement’s goals?

  • Very likely 19%
  • Somewhat likely 26%
  • Not very likely 11%
  • Not at all likely 23%

Do you think that abortion should be…

  • Legal under any circumstances 19% (23%) {20%} [21%] (18%)
  • Legal under certain circumstances 57% (50%) {54%} [54%] (58%)
  • llegal in all circumstances 22% (24%) {23%} [23%] (22%)

Which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible?

  • The Bible is the inspired word of God but not everything in it should be taken literally, word for word. 49% (47%) {49%} [48%] (56%)
  • The Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word. 30% (34%) {33%} [32%] (25%)
  • The Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral precepts recorded by men. 18% (16%) {15%} [17%] (17%)

Survey of 1,143 adult residents of Pennsylvania, including 954 registered voters, and 324 likely voters, was conducted January 18-24, 2010. The margin of error is +/- 2.9 percentage points. The sample error for registered adults is +/- 3.2 percentage points and is slightly higher for registered Democrats (+/- 4.5 percentage points) and registered Republicans (+/- 5.3 percentage points). Party registration breakdown: 51% (46%) {49%} [48%] (52%) Democrat; 36% (43%) {39%} [39%] (36%) Republican; 10% (9%) {10%} [10%] (8%) Independent. Party ID breakdown: 36% (31%) {36%} [34%] (37%) Democrat; 24% (30%) {27%} [28%] (23%) Republican; 36% (37%) {33%} [34%] (35%) Independent. Political views: 37% (42%) {39%} [43%] (37%) Conservative;33% ( 30%) {36%} [36%] (34%) Moderate;21% (19%) { 16%} [16%] (19%) Liberal. Results from the poll conducted January 18-24, 2010 are in parentheses. Results from the poll conducted October 20-25, 2009 are in curly brackets. Results from the poll conducted August 25-31, 2009 are in square brackets. Results from the poll conducted June 16-21, 2009 are in parentheses.

by @ 2:12 pm. Filed under 2010, Barack Obama, Poll Watch
Trackback URL for this post:
http://race42012.com/2010/02/24/poll-watch-franklin-marshall-pennsylvania-senatorial-survey/trackback/

12 Responses to “Poll Watch: Franklin & Marshall Pennsylvania Senatorial Survey”

  1. greg Says:

    OH NO! obama camp is starting on strategy on the 2012 campaign ALREADY ! I thought they would not start till at least late fall 2011 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33411.html

  2. Josiah Schmidt (Gary Johnson 2012) Says:

    Go Pat Toomey!

  3. Dave Says:

    This poll shows the importance of filtering for likely voters, among whom Toomey leads by 10 points. The salient number though is that 63% of the electorate in Pennsylvania thinks it’s time for a change. There’s no way for Specter to get elected without divine intervention.

    BTW, speaking of the divine, I like the fact that 79% think the Bible qualifies, while only 18% construe it to be myth.

  4. Sarah & Mike: Fox Superstars Says:

    Closer than I thought in Penn..

  5. Adam Brickley Says:

    Even if Toomey is a little behind here – there’s lots of undecideds and Snarlin’ Arlen has big problems with his favorability rating.

  6. Sean P Says:

    Question: Is Arlen (who has turned into Obamacare’s biggest whore in the Senate since switching parties) more likely to swing back to the center-right if he loses the Primary on May 18, or if he wins? On the one hand, if he loses, he might be upset at Obama for not clearing the field for him, and Reid for making him an 80+ year old Junior Senator, and decide to extract revenge by derailing their signature initiative. On the other hand, Obammacare can’t be polling well in Pennsylvania, and if he is the nominee he might be inclined to ditch his support to better position himself against Toomey.

  7. Bob Hovic Says:

    Is there an accepted rule-of-thumb for the standard difference between an RV poll and LV? I usually expect about five points or so of swing toward Republicans, but that’s not based on any study I’ve seen.

    The swing here, 14-15 points seems unusually high — I suppose a result of the high level of motivation among Republicans, and discouragement among Democrats.

  8. Aron Goldman Says:

    GOP Leaders Build New Home for Moderates
    http://www.frumforum.com/gop-leaders-build-new-home-for-moderates-2

    A new center-right think-tank is launching into the partisan-torn D.C. political scene. Helmed by Republican bigwigs — including Norm Coleman, Jeb Bush, and Tom Ridge — the American Action Project promises to reach out to moderate conservatives and conservative independents.

    Yesterday, former Minnesota Senator Norm Coleman, former CBO director Douglas Holtz-Eakin and former Eric Cantor Chief of Staff Rob Collins announced the launch of a new “action-tank” at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

    With political superstars like former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, former ambassador to the E.U. Boyden Gray and former Senator Mel Martinez on their board, this new project will wield considerable political clout especially as Washington gears up for the upcoming 2010 congressional races and 2012 presidential election.

    In a town where the dialogue has become increasingly polarized, the “action-tank” will try to build a center-right coalition using a big-tent philosophy. Coming in the wake of Glenn Beck’s CPAC keynote, where he asserted that conservatives didn’t need to reach out to a big tent, the American Action project appears to be a breath of fresh air.

    The center-right is a “very broad spectrum,” acknowledged Chairman Fred Malek, noting that their new project would view “politics [as] a game of addition, not subtraction.”

    Their project consists of two sister organizations: the American Action Forum, a policy arm led by Holtz-Eakin, and the American Action Network, a political arm led by Collins.

    The AA Forum, the policy arm, was created to reflect the diversity of ideas on the center-right — to refine and contribute ideas with an eye on developing events.

    The AA Network, the political arm, will be charged with engaging with lawmakers and the general public, especially students. “We’ll engage with American citizens through citizen gatherings, new media, old media, social networking and other means to generate support to turn center-right ideas into action.”

  9. WSU Says:

    Best of luck to AA – but how on earth do you tackle major social problems with that kind of system?

  10. jfmk Says:

    I don’t think this poll can be trusted. There’s no way Rendell’s only at -3 here.

  11. MWS Says:

    44% of Democrats don’t know who they will vote for in the primary. That is a very bad omen for an incumbant. Typically, we should expect those undecideds to break overwhelmingly for the challenger.

    I give Sestak at least a 40% chance of winning the primary.

  12. Dave Says:

    I was reading an article on this poll over at Real Clear Politics. Toomey is even winning (44 to 41) among union members. The current congressional delegation, which is 12D, 7R, could very well flip this cycle.

State of the Race


Obama Approval


Support R4'12

Meta

Recent Posts

Buy This Book

Categories

Archives

Search

Blogroll

Site Syndication

Main