January 21, 2010

Edwards’ Lack of Condom Use Leads to Questions about His Judgment

The media is quick to judge politicians when their most serious of personal sins are revealed to the public.  I am generally not so quick to dismiss the prospects of a political leader who admits to a  sexual indiscretion, as I am not convinced it has much of a bearing on their ability to lead (as long as the other party was willing and of age).

In the case of John Edwards, I will not hesitate to hold back such criticism, for one important reason;

With his admission this morning, it is clear that Senator Edwards did not use birth control, or at least any type of contraceptive that prevents the spreading of STD’s.

You may ask, why is this important?

I am presuming Senator Edwards was still sexually active with his wife (they were conceiving children at a late age) at the same time he was engaged in sexual relations with other women.  Senator Edwards wife, battling cancer and living with an immune system under attack, was put at great risk due to her husbands unwillingness to use a condom.

It was the personal choice of Senator Edwards to disregard his own health, but to recklessly endanger his ill wife is evidence that he lacks the judgment and character to be a senior elected official.

_____________________________________________

Kristofer Lorelli is the Senior Editor of Race42012 and can be contacted at lorville@rogers.com, on Facebook and Twitter/Kris_Lorelli

by @ 10:33 am. Filed under 2010
Trackback URL for this post:
http://race42012.com/2010/01/21/edwards-lack-of-condoms-use-leads-to-questions-about-his-judgement/trackback/

14 Responses to “Edwards’ Lack of Condom Use Leads to Questions about His Judgment”

  1. Alex Knepper Says:

    I’ll make sure not to vote for him this year, then.

  2. MPC Says:

    I laughed when I saw this.

    It’s like saying “Breaking News: Paris Hilton is a ho”

  3. hamaca Says:

    1. Funny. But what if it came to light that it simply broke and he was, therefore, exercising good judgement. Would that change your mind and could he then count on your vote?

  4. Kristofer Lorelli Says:

    Alex,

    What is with the GOP association at your school?!?!?!

  5. Alex Knepper Says:

    4 – What mean you?

  6. Alex Knepper Says:

    Kristofer knows how to capture the angle no one else is getting!

  7. Kristofer Lorelli Says:

    I heard they pulled funding for the MM event, because of her stance on equal rights.

  8. Alex Knepper Says:

    7 – What are you talking about? Meghan McCain came here last semester. I was front-row for her with others in the College Republicans, and attended a small afterparty. American U was her first college speaking event.

  9. Kristofer Lorelli Says:

    oh shoot….sorry, it was another Univ. in the D.C. area. I confused the two schools.

    http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=&sc2=news&sc3=&id=101324

  10. Aron Goldman Says:

    I am presuming Senator Edwards was still sexually active with his wife (they were conceiving children at a late age) at the same time he was engaged in sexual relations with other women.

    Not sure of the timeline of when Edwards’ affair with Rielle Hunter began, but Elizabeth’s cancer was detected after she cracked a rib while John was on top of her during sex.

  11. wateredseeds Says:

    You know it’s funny….before the scandal…i was most afraid of Edwards NOT Obama. How wrong I was. Should’ve known better.

  12. DanL Says:

    How very tacky.

  13. Kristofer Lorelli Says:

    National Enquirer submitting John Edwards coverage for Pulitzers

    By Howard Kurtz

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012102670.html?hpid=topnews

  14. aft Says:

    Anybody surprised? Didn’t think so.

    The most disturbing part to me is the willingness of the Democrats to cover everything up. First the affair, then the paternity.

State of the Race


Obama Approval


Support R4'12

Meta

Recent Posts

Buy This Book

Categories

Archives

Search

Blogroll

Site Syndication

Main