from Redstate’s Erick:
Jill Lawrence pulls a Roger Simon
By ErickBy now we should all be familiar with Roger Simon’s stunt. Fred Thompson, failing to bow down before Roger Simon, saw a campaign stop totally mischaracterized by Roger Simon. What was a light hearted moment turned into a moment of campaign ineptitude in Roger Simon’s eyes. Luckily the moment was caught on film and the world could see for itself that Roger Simon was full of crap.
It’s happened again.
Jill Lawrence, no doubt feeling slighted by the campaign for not getting a one on one with FDT, had her revenge in USA Today. She writes:
Bill Theobald of Gannett News Service … quotes [Fred Thompson] saying he doesn’t like modern campaigning, isn’t that interested in running for president and “will not be devastated” if he doesn’t win.
After putting that up, she had to correct herself when Bill Theobald told her she got it wrong.
Bill calls to clarify that Thompson said he doesn’t like the process of running for president but he does want to BE president.
Perhaps she could have gotten it right the first time. After all, it wasn’t even her own first hand reporting. She was reporting on what another reporter reported. Maybe if she didn’t feel her ego had been slighted by the Thompson campaign she would have tried to, you know, get it right the first time.
By the way, the Thompson camp was kind enough to send me a transcript so we can see for ourselves just how inaccurate Jill Lawrence’s third hand reporting was. The question was, “Do you want to be President?” Based on the question and just the first ten words, you’d think Jill Lawrence could have gotten it right:
The first place, I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t. I wouldn’t be doing this. I grew up in very modest circumstances. I left government and I and my family have made sacrifices to be sitting here today. I haven’t had any income for a long time because I figured to be clean, you’ve got to cut everything off. I was doing speaking engagements and I had a contract to do a tv show. I had a contract with ABC radio…and so forth. A man would have to be a total fool to do all those things and to be leaving his family which is not a joyful thing if he didn”t want to do it.
I am not consumed by personal ambition. I will not be devastated if I don’t do it. I want the people to have the best president they can have.
And you wonder why I defend Thompson against the lazy charge.
UPDATE: Of course, this was all videotaped AGAIN and aired on CSPAN, and once again, the press can bite me and my red pick up. Jim Geraghty has more:
But having now seen video of the event, the account appears to be a pretty selective take on it. Thompson appears to be at a Q & A with an event host, and a questioner asks, “if I caucus for you next week, are you still going to be there two months from now?”
The event host says, “Senator, you were a little bit late getting into the race.”
Fred responds, “The fact of the matter is, others started this process a lot earlier this time than they normally do.”
“Right after the last election.” (some laughter)
“I think that for some of them, they were juniors in high school.” More laughter, applause, and then this lengthy answer from Thompson transcribed by your friendly neighborhood campaign correspondent:
“That is a very good question… Not because it’s difficult to answer, but because I’m gonna answer a little bit of a different way than what you might expect. In the first is wanting the opporunity. I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t. I wouldn’t be doing this if I didn’t. I grew up in very modest circumstances. And I left government and I and my family have made sacrifices for me to be sitting here today. I haven’t had any income for a long time because I’m doing this. I figure if you’re gonna be clean, you have to cut the [unintelligible] off. And I was doing speaking engagements, and I had a contract to do a TV show, I had a contract with ABC radio like I was talking about earlier and so forth… I guess one would have to be a total fool to do all of those things and to be leaving his family, which is not a joyful thing at all… if you didn’t want to do it.
But I am not consumed by personal ambition. I will not be devastated if I don’t do it. I want the people to have the best president they can have. (applause) When his talk first started it didn’t originate with me. There are a lot of people around the country and both directly and through polls… liked the idea of me stepping up. And of course, you always look better at a distance, I guess. (laughter) But most of those people are still there and think it’s a good idea.
I approach it from the standpoint of a deal… Of kind of a marriage. You know, if one side of the marriage has to be really talked into the marriage, you know, it’s probably not going to be a very good deal for either one of them. But if you mutually think that this is a good thing – in this case, if you think this is a good thing for the country, the you have the opportunity to do some wonderful things together. I’m offering myself up. I’m saying that if I have the background, the capability and the concern to do this and I’m doing this for the right reasons… but I’m not particularly interested in running for president, but I think I’d make a good president. Nowadays, the process has become much more important than I think it used to be.
I don’t know if they ever asked George Washington a question like this. I don’t know if they ever asked Dwight D. Eisenhower a question like this. Nowadays it’s all about fire in the belly. I’m not sure that in the world we live in today, it’s a terribly good thing for a president to have too much fire in his belly.
I approach life differently than a lot of people. People, I guess, are wondering how I’ve been as successful as I’ve been in everything I’ve done. I’ve won two races in Tennessee by twenty points in a state Bill Clinton carried twice. I had never run for office before. I’ve never had an acting lesson, and I guess that’s obvious. (laughter). When I did it, I did it. It wasn’t just a lark. Anything worth doing is worth doing well. I’ve always been a little more laid back than most. I like to say I’m only consumed by very few things, and politics is not one of them. The welfare of my country, and my kids and grandkids, growing up, is one of them. (applause)
If what people really want in their president is a super type A personality, someone who has gotten up every morning and gone to bed every night and been thinking about, for years how they can be president of the United States… someone who can look you straight in the eye and say they’ve enjoyed every minute of campaigning… (laughter) I ain’t that guy. (more laughter) [To questioner] So I hope I’ve discussed that, or I haven’t talked you out of anything. I honestly want… I can’t imagine a worse set of circumstances than achieving the presidency under a false pretenses, especially if you feel the way I do. I’ve gone out of my way to be myself, because I don’t want anybody to think they’re getting something they’re not getting. I’m not consumed by this process, I’m not consumed with the notion of being president. I’m simply saying I’m willing to do what’s necessary to achieve it if I’m in sync with the people. And if the people want me, or somebody like me, I will do what I’ve always done with everything else in my life. I will take it on and do a good job. You’ll have the disadvantage of having someone who probably cna’t jump up and click their heels three times, but will tell you the truth. And you’ll know where the president stands at all times.”
December 29th, 2007 at 5:30 pm
Is everybody trying to ignore Iowa polls. I know, is ARG but CAME ON!.
December 29th, 2007 at 5:31 pm
I am not consumed by personal ambition. I will not be devastated if I don’t do it. I want the people to have the best president they can have.
That is actually a tremendous response. Good form!
December 29th, 2007 at 5:35 pm
Nobody can fault Fred’s desire over the course of the last couple of months, but it was too late to change an image forged earlier in the process. He announced his candidacy 6 months after he announced that he might run for the presidency. During that 6 months he could have been laying the foundation for a successful campaign. Instead, he wore out his welcome. He’s a good man and has put together an excellent platform, but his sense of timing is what he will be remembered for.
December 29th, 2007 at 5:35 pm
Uh-Oh!
December 29th, 2007 at 5:39 pm
Huckabee outdraws Romney, Big Time
December 29th, 2007 at 5:41 pm
#4 Colin,
As a Paul supporter myself, I think Ron Paul should refuse to take part in the debate, even if Fox relents and offers him a spot on the stage. He’d probably just get shoved off to the end of the stage and get asked a total of two questions, both about Abraham Lincoln or some trivial crap like that.
Ron’s time would be better spent hosting a huge townhall meeting right next door, where he could take openly and at length about real issues with NH voters.
December 29th, 2007 at 5:42 pm
Falz,
I suspect that ARG will have the last laugh when the Iowa Caucus results are announced. They have Romney up by 9 points, 32 to 23, reducing Huck’s Iowa lead in RCP to 2 points. If you look at the poll of 15,000 likely caucus attendees cited by Novak earlier today, which has Mitt at 30 and Huck at 25, ARG is only 2 points higher for Mitt and 2 points lower for Huck. The Huckster peaked too early and the momentum is all Mitt’s.
December 29th, 2007 at 5:44 pm
talk openly* rather…
December 29th, 2007 at 5:51 pm
Fred is showing appropriate drive the last couple months, and if Mitt fails, I’ll gladly support him.
December 29th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
There has been a 60 point swing in intrade.com for Romney Huckabee. Current is Romney 65 Huckabee 35
GOOOOOOOO MITTTT!!!!!!
December 29th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
#9, It looks like we agree again, with subtle differences – if Huck fails, Ill support Fred as well.
Also, I replied to your #75 on the fake huckabee ad… in case you wanted to know.
December 29th, 2007 at 5:57 pm
NH Intrade Mitt 56 McCain 32 Where is metro when you need him? lol
December 29th, 2007 at 6:04 pm
Brett P: I read your response. Keep your options open!!
I hope Romney’s close to your #2 as well.
December 29th, 2007 at 6:08 pm
As Metro relentlessly reminds us, Intrade is where the so-called smart money is. There is some truth to this….at least at the end of a campaign. Now that we’re getting to the end of the campaign, the money is going toward Mitt and Huckabee is yesterday’s news.
December 29th, 2007 at 6:20 pm
#13 – If, big if, Huck does not make it, and Romney comes out of Florida strong and the contest is between Rudy, McCain and Romney in Texas (my home state) then I might pick Romney over McCain – it will take some convincing to do so.
But I still strongly believe that Mike will pull a victory to the likes of which we havent seen.
I have only one I cant vote for, and that is Rudy.
December 29th, 2007 at 6:38 pm
I appreciate that, Brett. Much more objective than most on here.
December 29th, 2007 at 7:35 pm
I like the response from Fred.
But it doesn’t exactly dispell the notion that he’s lazy and won’t fight for the nomination!
If he doesn’t fight to be president will he be tough enough AS president?
Anyway it doesn’t matter as he will be out after NH.
December 29th, 2007 at 7:48 pm
Fred just doesn’t know how to help himself. Today he said he wasn’t “particularly interested in running for president.”
Poor Fredheads, look what a clunker you guys fell for!
http://catholicsforhuckabee.blogspot.com/2007/12/fred-thompson-im-not-interested-in.html
December 30th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
[...] Race 4 2008: “The MSM Can Bite Me and My Red Pick Up” [...]