September 30, 2007

Poll Alert: Rasmussen South Carolina GOP Nomination

Rasmussen’s new poll of South Carolina is in stark contrast to ARG’s.

South Carolina- GOP Nomination

  • Fred Thompson 24%
  • Rudy Giuliani 20%
  • Mitt Romney 15%
  • John McCain 10%
  • Mike Huckabee 3%

South Carolina Survey of 863 Likely GOP Primary Voters. Conducted September 26-27, 2007 by Rasmussen Reports

Hat tip: Awakened

by @ 11:14 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

Poll Alert: ARG Iowa & New Hampshire

All right, Romney and Huckabee supporters, let’s see if you guys still buy ARG’s polling.

American Research Group GOP Iowa Caucus Poll, conducted September 26-29, 2007

  • Mitt Romney 22% (-5)
  • Rudy Giuliani 21% (+4)
  • Fred Thompson 16% (+3)
  • John McCain 11% (+6)
  • Mike Huckabee 5% (-10)

Margin of Error: ± 4 percentage points.

American Research Group New Hampshire Primary Poll, conducted September 26-29, 2007

  • Romney 24% (-3)
  • McCain 20% (+8)
  • Rudy 20% (-3)
  • Thompson 8% (even)
  • Huckabee 3% (-6)

Margin of Error: ± 4 percentage points.

by @ 8:15 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

Debunking ARG Polls

Note: All poll results taken from Real Clear Politics. GRAPH WARNING

Obviously, it took a poll like the one in South Carolina to cause me to do more than laugh off the results of the latest ARG Poll. So, I decided to do some research on ARG’s numbers in comparison to other polls taken at the same time.

Notice anything strange? Here are the poll results from four seperate polls taken between September 9 and September 19 in Florida:

    Giuliani

  • Rasmussen 29
  • Mason Dixon 24
  • Insider Advantage 24
  • ARG 26
  • Thompson

  • Rasmussen 23
  • Mason Dixon 23
  • Insider Advantage 23
  • ARG 16

    McCain

  • Rasmussen 12
  • Mason Dixon 9
  • Insider Advantage 11
  • ARG 18
  • Romney

  • Rasmussen 11
  • Mason Dixon 13
  • Insider Advantage 12
  • ARG 14

Now, even stranger, notice McCain’s numbers in New Hampshire compared to others taken in June.

    Thompson

  • ARG 3
  • Mason Dixon 12
  • Franklin Pierce 9
  • CNN/WMUR 12
  • Giuliani

  • ARG 21
  • Mason Dixon 16
  • Franklin Pierce 18
  • CNN/WMUR 20
  • McCain

  • ARG 30
  • Mason Dixon 15
  • Franklin Pierce 17
  • CNN/WMUR 20
  • Romney

  • ARG 23
  • Mason Dixon 27
  • Franklin Pierce 27
  • CNN/WMUR 28

There are many more examples of this, that I will post once I can get my excel charts working.

Let’s look at South Carolina by itself in May, comparing two polls, ARG and Insider Advantage:

    Thompson

  • ARG 13
  • Insider Adv 13
  • Giuliani

  • ARG 23
  • Insider Adv 18
  • McCain

  • ARG 32
  • Insider Adv 17
  • Romney

  • ARG 10
  • Insider Adv 8

Now, let’s compare June’s Mason Dixon poll and ARG poll in the state of South Carolina. One must remember that Mason Dixon is considered one of the best when measuring state support:

    Thompson

  • ARG 19
  • Mason Dixon 25
  • Giuliani

  • ARG 22
  • Mason Dixon 21
  • McCain

  • ARG 23
  • Mason Dixon 7
  • Romney

  • ARG 8
  • Mason Dixon 11

I’m starting to see a pattern. How about you? There are many more, and this post could go on all night long.

by @ 8:00 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

Poll Alert: ARG South Carolina

UUHHHHH…. If these are true, then I’ll eat my shorts and endorse Mitt Romney as the second coming of Moses…

ARG Polling South Carolina GOP
(Last months in parenthesis)

  • Mitt Romney 26% (+17)
  • Rudy Giuliani 23% (-3)
  • John McCain 15% (+3)
  • Fred Thompson 10% (-11)
  • Newt Gingrich 7% (+1)
  • Mike Huckabee 1% (-8%)

Sample Size: 600 completed telephone interviews among a random sample of likely Republican primary voters living in South Carolina (524 Republicans and 76 independent voters).

Sample Dates: September 26-29, 2007

by @ 3:43 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

Congratulations to Dr. Paul

He has met his fundraising goals this last week. His supporters doubled his goal of raising 500,000 dollars in one week, bringing in over 1 million dollars in seven days.

    Dr. Paul was campaigning in New Hampshire with his wife Carol and their family when our $1,000,000 goal was reached last night. As the time drew near, they watched on a laptop as the counter reached the $1 million mark. They, along with staff, supporters and volunteers throughout the country then celebrated this extraordinary accomplishment.

    Over $1,000,000 raised in seven days for the Ron Paul 2008 presidential campaign. Remarkable!

    On behalf of Dr. Paul and every member of the campaign staff: Thank you!!

    Kent Snyder
    Chairman
    Ron Paul 2008

Update: Reports out of the Paul camp are that they will exceed their 2nd quarter totals. Great job to the Paul campaign and his band of supporters.

by @ 2:30 pm. Filed under Fundraising, Ron Paul

Hillary as Gore (and Tom Dewey!)

Hopeless liberal Frank Rich, whose television appearances I can’t bear to watch due to his stereotypical Boomer self-righteousness, proves that liberals are just as nervous about 2008 as many conservatives. His latest notes the similarities between likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and two presidential losers of the past. Money quote:

The Clinton machine runs as smoothly and efficiently as a Rolls. And like a fine car, it is just as likely to lull its driver into complacent coasting and its passengers to sleep. What I saw on television last Sunday was the incipient second coming of the can’t-miss 2000 campaign of Al Gore.

That Mr. Gore, some may recall, was not the firebrand who emerged from defeat, speaking up early against the Iraq war and leading the international charge on global warming. It was instead the cautious Gore whose public persona changed from debate to debate and whose answers were often long-winded and equivocal (even about the Kansas Board of Education’s decision to ban the teaching of evolution). Incredibly, he minimized both his environmental passions and his own administration’s achievements throughout the campaign.

He, too, had initially been deemed a winner, the potential recipient of a landslide rather than a narrow popular-vote majority.

Mrs. Clinton wouldn’t repeat Mr. Gore’s foolhardy mistake of running away from her popular husband and his record, even if she could. But almost every answer she gave last Sunday was a rambling and often tedious Gore-like filibuster. Like the former vice president, she often came across as a pontificator and an automaton – in contrast to the personable and humorous person she is known to be off-camera. And she seemed especially evasive when dealing with questions requiring human reflection instead of wonkery.

In this context it’s worth noting that Mr. Bush’s desperate lame-duck campaign to brand himself as a reincarnation of Harry Truman is not 100 percent ludicrous. A tiny part of the analogy could yet pan out. In 1948, Washington’s commentators and pollsters were convinced that Americans, tired of 15 years of Democratic rule, would vote in a Republican. Like today’s G.O.P., the Democrats back then were saddled with both an unloved incumbent president and open divisions in the party’s ranks on both its left and right flanks. Surely, the thinking went, the beleaguered Democrats couldn’t possibly vanquish a presidential candidate from New York known for his experience, competence, uncontroversial stands and above-the-fray demeanor.

But they did. What’s interesting about both Gore and Dewey is that both lost the Electoral College by a few votes in a few states. Gore, of course, lost by just over 500 votes in Florida. Tom Dewey, as I just learned from Kavon last week over the R408 Batphone, lost the Electoral College to Truman by only a few votes despite losing the popular vote by four points. As such, Rich is arguing that 2008 — with a divided, embattled incumbent party and a PermaFreeze general election frontrunner — is starting to look eerily similar to the two closest presidential elections of the last century.

I agree. I think we’re looking at another nailbiter of epic proportions. Despite my pessimism, the fact remains that Republicans have a number of strong candidates, many of whom have won tough races in the past and all of whom will run away from Bush after the nod is clinched. But we’re still a deeply divided party presiding over an unpopular war. If the Dems were running Mark Warner, the race would already be over. But they’re not. They’re running a candidate who will perpetuate Boomer polarization, who has high negatives, and who is reminiscent of the stiffest losers of presidential history. But still, the Dems have a ridiculous fundraising advantage and Americans now view them more favorably than the GOP on nearly every issue. This is the formula that almost always leads to an election for the history books.

Moreover, the Electoral College, especially in a Rudy/Hillary race, seems to be looking for ways to produce a 269-269 tie and send Tim Russert into dry-erase-board heaven. That’s because all of the Republicans, Rudy included, are doing worse than Bush in the Midwest and border states while Rudy specifically is upping GOP numbers on the coasts. If Rudy wins New Jersey, Washington, and Oregon, three blue states that are showing statistical ties between Rudy and Hillary right now, and if he picks up the Maine congressional district that Bush lost by only 5 points, he gains 34 EVs for the GOP. But if Hillary wins many of the red states in which she currently leads — New Mexico, Iowa, Ohio, Virginia, and Arkansas — she picks up 51 red EVs, which brings the country to, you guessed it, a 269-269 split.

As such, if you liked the aftermath of the 2000 election, complete with chads and lawsuits and Bush v. Gore, you’ll love November and December of 2008. Will future law students be reading about the Supreme Court’s decision in Giuliani v. Clinton in their casebooks? Stay tuned.

by @ 1:23 pm. Filed under Uncategorized

Random Thoughts On a Sunday Morning

Here are some random thoughts on this Sunday morning for you to discuss while I am up with my 10-week-old son:

  • Out of any of the four frontrunners, does anyone have a more difficult path to the nomination that Fred Thompson? Romney, though his leads are shrinking, is still ahead in IA, NH, NV, and depending on the poll perhaps MI. Rudy is in second place in nearly all of those states, meaning he could pull the upset in one or be strong enough to survive until FL. McCain is pouring resources into NH and seeing his numbers rebound there, even while they sink like a stone elsewhere. But Fred… according to the poll averages, Fred is in third place in Iowa and in danger of being passed by Huckabee; he’s in fourth place in New Hampshire; third in Nevada, and fourth in Michigan. Is there any way a front runner survives two third place and two fourth place finishes in the first four contests?
  • Speaking of Giuliani, I am becoming more and more convinced that this race will boil down to a Rudy-Romney matchup just as a virtue of the winnowing process of the early primary states. The first four states are all Romney-Giuliani in first and second place, in that order. Granted, that could change in the 90 some days between now and the primaries, but not very much or very easily. The only big events left are the debates, and Romney and Giuliani have both shown they can hold their own during them.
  • Sam Brownback says he will be staying in the race until after the Iowa caucuses. What’s with this guy? He’s polling at 1% in Iowa, has negative momentum in the state, is out of cash, and lost all his supporters to Mike Huckabee. My hope is that he’ll be financially unable to continue after the 3Q fundraising numbers come in, but I think he sees himself on some religious quest that he must complete come hell or high water.
  • Speaking of religion, one of Fred Thompson’s biggest mistakes so far in this campaign – and he has made more than even I thought he was going to – was to tell his supporters that he didn’t really attend church and wasn’t going to talk about religion on the campaign trail. Still trying to figure out the strategy behind that while trying to become the white knight of the religious right. The rumor from several different sources now is that the Arlington Group, a loose federation of religious, pro-family groups, will not endorse anybody in this primary – they were holding out for Thompson to enter the race but have been unimpressed since he did so. Where will religious conservatives land in this election? Methinks they will vote for… Giuliani, and Romney, and McCain, and Thompson.
  • Speaking of big mistakes, Mitt’s comments about his sons serving their country by helping get their dad elected (yes, I know it’s a misquote, but it’s how people understood it) may have hurt him more than we know. At dinner with my father-in-law tonight, a reliably staunch but common sense conservative, he explained to me his dilemma. He will never vote for Rudy Giuliani, he said, because of his leadership style (authoritarian, ruthless, takes credit for everything) and because of his views on gun control and abortion (he doesn’t trust his recent comments to the NRA and saying he’ll appoint the right judges). He was leaning toward Romney, he said, until he heard that quote about his sons. According to him, “that kind of turned me off to him.”
  • The thing about NH going three days after IA is that means we won’t have any really accurate polls for New Hampshire after the Iowa caucuses are completed. To get a good sample, most top-notch polling agencies like to poll over a 2-3 day period which will not be available between the two states. If McCain continues his push in the state, and Rudy continues to nip at Mitt’s heels, that means New Hampshire ’08 might well become the most excited, anticipated, and unknown primary in recent memory.
  • I could vote for Ron Paul so easily if it weren’t for his views on the war on terror…
  • I could vote for Tom Tancredo so easily if it weren’t for… no, wait, nevermind.
  • I would definitely vote for John McCain before I’d vote for Rudy Giuliani at this point.
  • I’m really hoping that two candidates drop out of the race between the release of 3Q numbers and the next debate in October. Really, I’d like four or five of them to drop out, but realistically speaking, I don’t think two would be too much to ask. In the order they should drop out: Brownback, Tancredo, Hunter, Paul.
  • Speaking of dropping out of the race, would one of the four frontrunners just offer the SecDef job to Duncan Hunter already so he can bow out?
  • And just for the record, I have a man-crush on Duncan Hunter. In a strictly platonic sort of way. :) Hey, he built that fence with his bare hands…!
by @ 6:10 am. Filed under 2008 Misc.

September 29, 2007

Poll Watch: SurveyUSA Washington State Presidential Election

SurveyUSA Washington State Presidential Election

  • Rudy Giuliani 47%
  • Hillary Clinton 47%
  • Hillary Clinton 52%
  • Fred Thompson 42%
  • Hillary Clinton 54%
  • Mitt Romney 40%
  • Barack Obama 52%
  • Rudy Giuliani 41%
  • Barack Obama 54%
  • Fred Thompson 40%
  • Barack Obama 57%
  • Mitt Romney 35%
  • John Edwards 45%
  • Rudy Giuliani 44%
  • John Edwards 51%
  • Fred Thompson 36%
  • John Edwards 55%
  • Mitt Romney 31%

Survey of registered voters was conducted September 17.

by @ 2:12 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

Gingrich Will Not Run in 2008- New York Times

NYT:

Newt Gingrich has sent so many hints pointing in so many different directions that we’re dizzy trying to follow them all. But now, it appears, he’s made up his mind.

Rick Tyler, Mr. Gingrich’s spokesman, confirmed today that the former Republican House speaker has decided against a presidential run in 2008.

Mr. Gingrich was “presented with legal advice this morning,” said Mr. Tyler in a quick phone interview. “There was a choice presented.”

The choice was to remain chairman of his political action committee, American Solutions, or to allow advisers to move forward with an exploratory committee. But he could not, legally, do both, Mr. Tyler explained.
“So Mr. Gingrich made a choice to remain a citizen activist,” he said.Mr. Gingrich’s flirtation with a candidacy has been long and replete with mixed signals. Throughout the spring, he mocked the other candidates for starting their campaigns so early, and he said then that if a “void” existed after his American Solutions conference in September, he would consider jumping in.

He seemed to be leaning against a run when Fred D. Thompson’s candidacy started to spur excitement among Republicans, but as Mr. Thompson’s campaign got off to a slow start, Mr. Gingrich appeared somewhat interested again.

He said that if his supporters could raise $30 million by November, he would have enough to compete. Then, as Katharine Q. Seelye reported yesterday, he set up a “feasibility assessment” to determine his chances, and he said he would make up his mind by Oct. 21. Well, in a rare occurrence in politics, Mr. Gingrich beat his own deadline.

Mr. Tyler said news on an official announcement from Mr. Gingrich would be forthcoming. Mr. Gingrich was to appear on Fox News today at 5 p.m.

UPDATE: The word from Gingrich is that there will be no endorsements in the forseeable future.

by @ 1:41 pm. Filed under Newt Gingrich

Poll Watch: Newsweek GOP Iowa Caucus

Newsweek GOP Iowa Caucus

  • Mitt Romney 24%
  • Fred Thompson 16%
  • Rudy Giuliani 13%
  • Mike Huckabee 12%
  • John McCain 9%
  • Ron Paul 5%
  • Undecided 15%

Second Choice

  • Rudy Giuliani 21%
  • Mitt Romney 21%
  • Fred Thompson 10%
  • John McCain 4%
  • Mike Huckabee 2%
  • Ron Paul 2%
  • Undecided 15%

Survey of likely Republican caucus-goers was conducted September 26-27. The margin of error is +/- 9 percentage points.

by @ 12:50 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

Race 4 2008 Afternoon Essential Reads

Rudy Giuliani

Fred Thompson

John McCain

Mitt Romney

Newt Gingrich

General Race 4 2008 News

Hillary Clinton

by @ 12:30 pm. Filed under R4'08 Essential Reads

The Disciplined Campaign or Are you Smarter than a 2nd Grader?

[WARNING TO INSIDE THE BELTWAY CONVENTIONAL WISDOM CONSERVATIVES: THIS BLOG IS NOT ABOUT JOHN EDWARDS OR MOVEON.ORG]

If one were to believe the fawning praise of inside the beltway political pundits, a shrewd strategist devising a plan on November 8, 2006 for a Democrat to win the White House on November 5, 2008 would propose that a candidate:

1) Change positions on the Iraq War with every release of a new Gallup Poll;

2) Vote to cut off funds to the troops in the field;

3) Slander the commanding general of a successful surge of troops in the field on national television by calling him a liar with a cute phrase worthy of those bewildered by the meaning of “is”;

4) Cackle at, instead of jabbing the knee of, Chris Wallace;

5) Express dismay that the Supreme Court upheld the federal law banning partial birth abortion;

6) Take money from a 15-year fugitive from justice;

7) Have her campaign utilize (and remain married to herself) a bitter, angry man that no longer can contain his Stephanopoulos described temper; and

8] Refused to denounce the idea of teaching 2nd graders about homosexuality.

Yeah, the Hillary is really disciplined. The kind of discipline that McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis had.

Many of even the beltway conservative pundits appear to be guilty, with respect to Hillary, of what most of the MSM is guilty of with respect to the Iraq War: boxing themselves in a position where to recognize reality is to discredit their own prior judgments.

Hillary has not been disciplined since she first met Bill in the Yale Law Library or even before, when she first read The Feminine Mystique.

Nor has she been disciplined since her first vote against tax cuts as a senator or her first move towards defeat in Iraq. She has been all over the lot on Iraq. It’s all on tape. Rush plays her varying statements all the time.

Have Fred Barnes and David Brooks and the rest of the conservative writers not heard them? Have they not seen her votes? If they have, then what can explain their obligatory statements that she is disciplined except that they want to be loved by their liberal cohorts in DC?

Discipline for a liberal that wants to be president means disguising ones liberalism. See the successful campaign in 1992 (see also Perot recruitment)

Teaching second graders about sex is not discipline except for those that really want to teach first graders the same.

Even Bob Shrum wouldn’t suggest that kind of discipline.

I contend that these liberal democrats simply cannot help themselves and that they will not allow our Republican candidate to lose in 2008.

Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
The HinzSight Report
The Minority Report
Race 4 2008
http://www.win-the-war.com/

by @ 9:48 am. Filed under Democrats

Him and His Brain

Lost in the excitement of this last week’s fundraising efforts were some of the “Ask Mitt Anything” stops he made. David Brody, the respected reporter from CBN, filed this report on Thursday:

by @ 6:22 am. Filed under Mitt Romney

September 28, 2007

Poll Watch: Elon University GOP North Carolina Primary

Elon University GOP North Carolina Primary

  • Fred Thompson 27.9%
  • Rudy Giuliani 21.0%
  • John McCain 12.2%
  • Mitt Romney 8.4%
  • Mike Huckabee 2.0%
  • Too early to tell 16.6%
  • Don’t know 8.1%

Survey of Republican adults was conducted September 24-27.

by @ 9:34 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

Ohio GOP Straw Poll Results

I don’t hold much value in straw poll results, but some on this site do. So, to show that one candidate doesn’t have a mandate on all straw polls, here are the results of the Ohio State Republican Party Straw Poll. They had a turnout of 2,300. From the Ohio GOP official site:

    Fred Thompson 33%
    Rudy Giuliani 24%
    Mitt Romney 17%
    John McCain 11%
    Mike Huckabee 7%
    Sam Brownback 4%
    Duncan Hunter 2%
    Ron Paul 1%
    Tom Tancredo 1%

Here is some of their report on the event:

    Political observers agree the race for the 2008 GOP presidential nomination is wide open at this point, and Ohio could play an important role in choosing the nominee when voters here go to the polls on March 4.

    “Your participation in the straw poll not only provides an early indication of how Ohio will vote but also demostrates your support of building a strong grassroots organization through our state party,” DeWine told the nearly 2,300 Ohioans who cast a straw poll ballot.

Now, back to the race

by @ 7:52 pm. Filed under Straw Polls

Poll Watch: Gallup GOP Subgroup National Primary

Gallup GOP Subgroup National Primary

Republican Nomination Preference by Ideological Self-Identification

Among Moderate/Liberal Republicans (N=544)

  • Giuliani 38%
  • Thompson 17%
  • McCain 16%
  • Romney 9%

Among Conservative Republicans (N=1,131)

  • Giuliani 30%
  • Thompson 23%
  • McCain 15%
  • Romney 10%

Republican Nomination Preference by Frequency of Church Attendance

Attend Church Weekly (N=689)

  • Giuliani 27%
  • Thompson 24%
  • McCain 17%
  • Romney 9%
  • Huckabee 7%

Attend Monthly (N=396)

  • Giuliani 33%
  • Thompson 18%
  • McCain 16%
  • Romney 14%

Seldom/Never Attend (N=577)

  • Giuliani 39%
  • Thompson 20%
  • McCain 13%
  • Romney 8%

Republican Nomination Preference by Religious Affiliation

Protestant/”Christian” (N=765)

  • Giuliani 28%
  • Thompson 23%
  • McCain 17%
  • Romney 8%

Catholic (N=273)

  • Giuliani 44%
  • Thompson 18%
  • McCain 13%
  • Romney 13%

Republican Nomination Preference by Region of the Country

Northeast (N=327)

  • Giuliani 43%
  • McCain 14%
  • Thompson 14%
  • Romney 13%

Midwest (N=365)

  • Giuliani 34%
  • Thompson 17%
  • McCain 16%
  • Romney 9%

South (N=616)

  • Giuliani 28%
  • Thompson 28%
  • McCain 12%
  • Romney 6%

West (N=382)

  • Giuliani 28%
  • McCain 19%
  • Thompson 18%
  • Romney 14%

Survey of 1,690 Republicans and Republican-leaning independents was conducted in August and September.

by @ 5:19 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

The Republican Candidates Need to Listen To…. Willie Sutton???

Jennifer Rubin makes sense of that headline at the AmSpec blog:

With the exception of the omnipresent John McCain and Mike Huckabee (who never met a talk show host he didn’t like), the presidential contenders do not frequent the Sunday talk shows, go on network news or subject themselves to interrogation by CNN or MSNBC reporters outside the few debates they have done.

This is a mistake. Simply put, GOP candidates are ignoring Willie Sutton’s advice. Sutton of course was the prolific bank robber who was said to have replied “that’s where the money is” when asked why he robbed banks. Likewise, the GOP contenders would be wise to go where the voters are, especially voters they are losing.

…..

It is perhaps natural in such times to go into a defensive crouch and stick to the safe confines of Fox News and friendly talk radio hosts. Particularly in a heated primary it makes perfect sense to seek out venues which have large numbers of politically active conservative listeners and viewers. But over time it is limiting and self-defeating for several reasons.

First, GOP candidates need to recapture independents and convince moderate Democrats they offer an attractive platform, not the cartoon positions attributed to them by their Democratic opponents. Explaining why the Bush tax cuts are worth keeping whether you are “rich” or not is a worthwhile and essential exercise not only to getting elected but building support for the policies they advocate.

Second, it is good practice. Debate moderators in the general election and the Washington press corps are not renowned for their sympathetic take on Republicans and conservative policies. It is helpful to practice answering the loaded question and disarming the questioner — as Rudy Giuliani did in the Iowa debate when he questioned the reporter’s premise that higher taxes would bring in more revenue. If you don’t practice in the primary. it makes the general election that much tougher.

Finally, Hillary Clinton this past weekend showed that it is not so difficult for a prepared and polished candidate to survive even the toughest inquisitor on Sunday morning, Tim Russert. Having done so she can claim that “they threw everything at me” but didn’t draw blood. She reached a huge audience and showed she is calm and collected under fire.

Now, it is not a good idea to go into the lion’s den unarmed or unprepared, but for candidates with solid debate skills, defined policies, and a decent sense of humor it doesn’t pay to hide in the safe confines of the conservative media. For individual candidates, the benefits of venturing out into the MSM world can be considerable. And if the GOP is going to start gaining back ground, showing their faces is one way they’ll begin to convince the American people that they do not deserve to be banished to the political wilderness.

Read the rest here.

by @ 4:34 pm. Filed under 2008 Misc.

More from California

Flap was in attendance yesterday for the Wilson-Giuliani endorsement, and was able to shot some great video of both the event and the media availablility afterwards.

Click here for Flap’s coverage of the endorsement.

Click here to see all of the terrific video.

P.S. If you are interested in the race for the 2008 Republican nomination (who isn’t after all?), Flap is an essential daily read. No one in the right-leaning blogosphere covers California like him.

If something is about to break in Republican politics in The Golden State, you can bet you will read it on Flap’s blog first.

by @ 4:26 pm. Filed under Rudy Giuliani

McCain Blogger Conference Call Recap

I sat in on Sen. McCain’s blogger conference call this afternoon. Here are the highlights:

  • McCain called in from Michigan where he addressed a meeting of the Detroit Hispanic Business Community this morning. The Senator believes his campaign is moving along well (and voiced pleasure regarding the success of his “No Surrender” tour), but realizes that the road ahead may be long and difficult.
  • Jennifer Rubin remarked that while he has improved his showing in New Hampshire, that progress has not translated to Iowa yet and asked if he had considered reallocating funds to Iowa and Michigan. McCain answered that money has never been a factor in his campaigns and that he has enough resources to do well. He is not know as well in Iowa as he is in South Carolina and New Hampshire, but hopes to change that with addition visits to the state.
  • He was then asked about the approaching 40th anniversary of being taken as a prisoner of war. McCain joked that perhaps he should take to the skies of Vietnam again to see if they would like to take another shot at him. McCain stated that in all honesty, it will be just another day for him. If he marks it in any way, he will do so be speaking with some old friends.
  • Asked what should be done about Burma, he replied that pressure should be exerted on China to help resolve the situation, as they would have the greatest influence. We need to tell China they have to stop supporting this regime. Trade and economic sanctions have to be involved. Burma has a lousy economy because they have a lousy government. McCain said that firm, decisive action needs to be taken against the thugs who run that country. Human rights violations and the slaughter of monks is totally unacceptable.
  • Captain Ed then asked why he skipped last night’s minority issues debate, sponsored by the Covenant with Black America. McCain stated that he had a major event in New York City that was scheduled well in advance of receiving an invitation to the debate, but he would be open to attending such a debate in the future. Regarding his appeal to minorities, he stated that he would rest on his record of advocacy for greater opportunity and a better future for all Americans. He pointed out that military service has provided great opportunity, and that many of our military’s greatest hero’s are minorities. He has always fought for equal opportunity for all Americans, and fought for recognition of MLK day in AZ. Despite the fact that the vast majority of the leadership of African American community are Democrats, the Republican Party is the party of opportunity. Many African Americans think the Republicans do not care about their future, so hard work must be done to show them otherwise.
  • Jim Geraghty asked for his response to the starling development of the Democratic Top Tier’s refusal to commit to troop withdrawl from Iraq in their last debate. McCain attributes this to the “Petreaus Affect”. General Petreaus has done well in communicating the success of the new strategy to the American People.
  • Asked for his reaction to Hillary Clinton’s proposal to give $5000 to every child born in America, McCain quipped that he would like to give every kid $100,000 if we could find a way to responsible way to pay for it. Simply raising taxes and passing the responsibility to pay for such a program on to future generations is not in the best interest of our nation.

  • That’s it for this week. Sen. McCain stated he will try to do another blogger call next Friday.

    by @ 3:52 pm. Filed under Blogger Conference Calls

    When Bad Analogies Go Bad

    NRO is hosting a Star Trek makeover today with some fun and satirical pieces. Stephen Hayward takes the opportunity to throw out the worst square-peg/round-hole analogy I’ve heard in a long time.

    This lack of sufficiency in individuals sounds very much like our GOP frontrunners. The parallels are not exact, of course, but they generally parse out in the following way: Giuliani is Piccard, with his brusque, “make-it-so” personality; McCain is the impetuous and volatile Riker; and Romney is clearly an analytical Betazoid. Each, by himself, has obvious limitations and defects, and thus appears incapable of effectively leading; combine the strengths of all three and the result would be a success.

    I just can’t get grip on any of these parallels. I’m glad to know it was a “mid-martini” moment. But take a look at the other articles. Good stuff.

    Also, I should note the NRO Editors speak out against a Gingrich candidacy.

    by @ 2:27 pm. Filed under 2008 Misc.

    The Washington Prowler: Friends Again?

    According to the man with the sources, the American Spectator’s Washington Prowler, not all of Fred Thompson’s week was spent fundraising in Tennessee:

      Earlier this week, former Sen. Fred Thompson met privately in Washington, D.C. with senior members of the Arlington Group, a coalition of social and religious conservatives. The meeting, according to Arlington Group members present, included members who had previously met with Thompson at a private meeting in the spring, prior to Thompson’s speech before the Council on National Policy.

      At the meeting this week Thompson answered questions and discussed his views on social issues, as well as his own faith, for more than an hour.

    by @ 12:59 pm. Filed under Uncategorized

    $75,000+ Grassroots Activism Vindicated?

    The results of last night’s Rally for Romney were exciting for the MMM crew. We brought in almost $4000 yesterday ramping up our total “take” for Mitt in ’07 to $75,000. Almost 10% of visitors to the site gave a contribution. It was an interesting case study.

    There’s quite the discussion going on at the Hugh Hewitt blog with Dean Barnett knocking the viability of activism vs. punditry and Patrick Ruffini chiming in with a good rebuttal. The question: does online activism really matter or is the influence of pundits more important? (Dean just responded again and again here).

    My two cents: Dean is right that the influence of blogs is overstated but Patrick is right to note that the future ma be owned by the blogs. Your thoughts.

    by @ 11:42 am. Filed under Mitt Romney

    Poll Watch: Rasmussen Daily Tracking (9/28)

    Interesting…

    Rasmussen Reports Daily Republican National Primary Tracking Poll

    • Thompson – 24%
    • Giuliani – 22%
    • Romney – 12%
    • McCain – 9%
    • Huckabee – 7%

    Daily tracking results are from survey interviews conducted over four days ending last night. Each update includes approximately 600-650 Likely Republican Primary Voters. Margin of sampling error for each is +/- 4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

    by @ 10:48 am. Filed under Poll Watch

    Poll Watch: FDU PublicMind GOP New Jersey Primary

    FDU PublicMind GOP New Jersey Primary

    • Rudy Giuliani 48%
    • Fred Thompson 12%
    • Mitt Romney 8%
    • John McCain 7%
    • Hillary Clinton 4%
    • Barack Obama 4%
    • Don’t Know 14%

    Among those with a preference

    • Rudy Giuliani 56%
    • Fred Thompson 14%
    • Mitt Romney 9%
    • John McCain 8%
    • Hillary Clinton 5%
    • Barack Obama 5%

    Survey of registered Republican voters was conducted September 17-23.

    by @ 10:00 am. Filed under Poll Watch

    September 27, 2007

    Poll Alert: Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll (9/27)

    Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll , GOP Nomination

    • Fred Thompson 26%
    • Rudy Giuliani 20%
    • Mitt Romney 13%
    • John McCain 11%
    • Mike Huckabee 6%

    Daily tracking results are from survey interviews conducted over four days ending last night. Each update includes approximately 600-650 Likely Republican Primary Voters. Margin of sampling error for each is +/- 4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

    by @ 10:57 pm. Filed under Poll Watch

    Race42008 Republican Debate Forum

    For all the people who still want to discuss the debate tonight.

    KEYES VS PAUL THE DEBUT TONIGHT!!!

    by @ 8:05 pm. Filed under Presidential Debates

    Race 4 2008 Evening Essential Reads

    Rudy Giuliani

    Fred Thompson

    John McCain

    Mitt Romney

    Newt Gingrich

    General Race 4 2008 News

    Hillary Clinton

    by @ 6:50 pm. Filed under R4'08 Essential Reads

    McCain on the Need for Energy Independence

    On the same day that Sen. McCain ran his first two TV ads in New Hampshire (as Kavon graciously posted below), he takes to the pages of the National Review to lay out his comprehensive energy policy. It’s a lengthy article, but it should definitely be read in full. Some important points:

    America’s dependency on foreign oil is a major strategic vulnerability for our nation. One element in al Qaeda’s war against us is to target the U.S. economy by driving up the price of oil in the hope that severe recession and higher inflation will follow. Osama bin Laden and other al Qaeda terrorists have spoken many times about the need to “mount … operations accordingly” in order to hit energy supply points in the Middle East and other regions to spike oil prices. Moreover, while most of the world’s known reserves are in the Persian Gulf, oil supplies are no more secure elsewhere on the globe. In Russia and Venezuela, Vladimir Putin and Hugo Chavez have rolled back democracy and utilized oil and gas as foreign policy weapons. Nigerian supplies – our fifth-largest supplier – are endangered by internal strife. Oil’s availability is uncertain and its price at the mercy of countries where our values aren’t typically shared and our interests aren’t their first priority….

    National security depends on energy security, which we cannot achieve if we remain so dependent on imported oil from Middle Eastern governments who support or foment, by their own inattention and inequities, the rise of terrorists or on swaggering demagogues and would be dictators in our hemisphere. Additionally, by mid-century there will be three-and-a-half billion cars worldwide – over four times the number today. As world demand for oil soars, higher prices, severe economic volatility, and heightened international tensions follow. These unpredictable forces could seriously circumscribe our future if we let them.

    As president, I won’t let that happen….

    With some of the savings from cutting subsidies for industries that can stand on their own, we can establish a national challenge to improve the cost, range, size, and weight of electric batteries for automobiles. Fifty percent of cars on the road are driven 25 miles a day or less. Affordable battery-powered vehicles, that can meet average commuter needs, could help us cut oil imports in half. The reward will be earned through merit by whoever accomplishes the task, whether it comes from a laboratory in the Department of Energy, a university, a corporation, or an enterprising young inventor who works out of his family’s garage….

    We have in use today, a zero-emission energy that could provide electricity for millions more homes and businesses than it currently does. Yet it has been over 25 years since a nuclear-power plant has been constructed. The barriers to nuclear energy are political not technological. We’ve let the fears of 30 years ago, and an endless political squabble over the storage of nuclear spent fuel make it virtually impossible to build a single new plant that produces a form of energy that is safe and non-polluting. If France can produce 80-percent of its electricity with nuclear power, why can’t we? Is France a more secure, advanced, and innovative country than we are? Are France’s scientists and entrepreneurs more capable than we are? I need no answer to that rhetorical question. I know my country well enough to know otherwise….

    Answering great challenges is nothing new to America. It’s what we do. We built the rockets that took us to the moon – not because it was easy, but because it was hard. We’ve sent space probes into the distant reaches of the universe. We harnessed nuclear energy, mapped the human genome, created the Internet, and pioneered integrated circuits that consolidate the computing power of the Apollo spacecraft onto a barely visible silicon chip. If we can do all this, we can surely solve our oil-dependence problem, and strengthen our security.

    Like so much in America these days, energy independence was a temporary fad. When gas prices climbed to over $3.50 a gallon last year, there was a vocal outcry for someone to do something. Politicians and pundits took to the airwaves to assure the public that energy independence was on the way. President Bush used much of his 2006 State of the Union to tout this goal. Lots of people decided to take public transportation, put their SUV’s in the garage, maybe even buy a Prius, but as soon as gas prices went down again, the old habits returned. Nowadays the issue of energy independence has virtually vanished from public discourse. That is until gas prices go up again, of course.

    That’s one thing, among many, that I admire about John McCain. He understands that it’s one thing to talk about developing more domestic energy sources and another thing to actually get it enacted. To achieve real change, the nation as a whole must be called upon to act. As McCain says, not because it’s easy, but because it’s hard.

    by @ 6:17 pm. Filed under Uncategorized

    Romney Rally Update

    We are just $2000 shy of our goal of $75,000. Right now there are about 30 people here driving donations for Mitt and thousands of other people all over the country doing the same thing. We’ve raised over $1500 just today and the deadline is at 9:00 for this rally.







    by @ 5:05 pm. Filed under Mitt Romney

    Running with Rudy: House Party Edition

    YouTube Preview Image
    by @ 5:04 pm. Filed under Rudy Giuliani

    2012 Newswire

    Obama Approval


    Support R4'12

    Meta

    Recent Posts

    Buy This Book

    Categories

    Archives

    Search

    Blogroll

    Site Syndication

    Main