July 31, 2007

Fundraising 101: Pay Attention Freddy Thompson

dashboard

Reports that Fred’s money machine may not be firing on all cylinders leads me to share what I?ve learned about fundraising in the last three years: it is very hard work.

But if you have the right model you can accomplish amazing things. As a comparison note that Romney raised about $3 million before lunch was over at his fundraising kickoff. The contrast is stark.

Here are some quick thoughts on what it takes to raise money.

First and foremost, understand some of the underlying rules of fundraising:

1. ?People give to people to help people? ? I?ve been working with non-profit organizations for over a decade. Without fail, a general clarion-call for money will fail compared to a plea for a specific cause, especially when it?s linked with a picture and a story. You need to have a compelling story with a person who can conjure up a compelling reason to compell people to open their wallets.

2. ?People give relative to their means? ? No matter what the cause, the dollar amount of donations from the 35-60 crowd will far outweigh the 20-30 crowd for one simple reason: they have $ to spend.

3. ?Those closest must set the pace? ? When Romney kicked off the exploratory committee with a national call day January 8th, the 5 Romney boys set the example for the other 400 fundraisers by sticking at their tables for the entire duration of the event. When Meg Whitman, CEO of Ebay takes 9 hours out of her day to sit at another table and ask people for money it makes an impact on everyone around her.

Next we need to take a look at the trends in fundraisings:

1. Growing use of the Internet for fundraising ? ?Growing? is the operative word. By most accounts donations raised via the Internet are pithy and underwhelming. Only a handful of non-profit organizations have shown more than 6 figures in online fundraising. The trend is obviously toward the Internet but it has not been the harbinger of $$$ that many expected.

2. Innovation and adopting new practices and models ? The key to fundraising is innovation. I wager that any one of us receives half-a-dozen letters a week soliciting for donations. Standing out above the noise is the key to successful fundraising. Take for instance Romney?s ?Students for Mitt? program where college students can receive 10% back on everything they raise for the campaign.

3. Involve everyone in fundraising ? I know some professional fundraisers who were very upset at the Romney campaign for opening the floodgates to anyone and everyone. But it?s paid off. For example, as a ?Patriot? level fundraiser I have the ability to create ?associate fundraisers?. I get credit for whatever money they bring in and they in turn get credit for being part of a successful team of advocates.

4. Contemporary corporate marketing practices ? Like any aged market, the political sphere has its own consultants, approaches, and software packages. Most every political campaign uses Aristotle Publishing for voter lists and most every 501(c)4 uses Capitol Advantage for online advocacy. Romney has broke the fundraising mold by utilizing a contact management system called SalesForce.com typically utilized by large and dispersed sales and business development groups.

5. MOST IMPORTANT: FOCUS ON DONORS: When you give $2300 dollars to a campaign you are the man (or at least you should be treated like ?the man?.) Next to your unpaid fundraisers you must focus like a laser beam on your high end contributors. By creating incentives and time factors into your efforts you create an energetic need to get involved and ?max out?. Romney has held numerous incentive-bases time-sensitive fundraising efforts to meet this challenge

Lastly, you need to understand WHY people give:

? They believe you are making a difference in a cause they care about.
? They value your work
? They see it as an investment
? They get something in return
? They feel good about themselves
? Returning a favor
? Solving a problem
? Sending a message
? Receiving quality information
? Aligning with peers
? Bringing justice to the world

If you cater your message to these efforts your fundraising effort might just work. But note this: by my calculations 60-70% of the money that Romney has raised has been at in-person events.

I?ve said this before but I believe that Fred is one election too early to concentrate on the virtual handshake. Romney has hosted approximately 120 in-person fundraising events since January. The average take at these events is probably $150,000+. You do the math. Better yet, Fred better do it.

by @ 7:26 am. Filed under Fundraising, Mitt Romney
Trackback URL for this post:
http://race42012.com/2007/07/31/fundraising-101-pay-attention-freddy-thompson/trackback/

7 Responses to “Fundraising 101: Pay Attention Freddy Thompson”

  1. Nusrat Says:

    I’ve said this before but I believe that Fred is one election too early to concentrate on the virtual handshake.

    Not really. It’s just that he’s trying to fake the online excitement.

  2. Eric Says:

    test

  3. Husky Says:

    People who give to Romney while he is still mired in low double digit national polls do it because they see a man who works his butt off to improve his situation. They see that his hard work and effort are working in IA and NH and with more money will come the opportunity to see his numbers go up across the nation. But to give to Fred who has repeatedly pushed back his announcement, done very little campaigning, fundraising, and anything else it takes, and is content to win voters with a webcam from his basement. I dont think that is a pitch that will win you dollars.

  4. Buckeyefan Says:

    I don’t think this pitch will win you votes or dollars in the years to come. People still like to see and hear their candidates. All you have to do is watch the young people at event and see how enthused they get to meet a candidate for President. The Internet cannot provide that type of excitement.

    Fred has always been known as being lazy and doing all your campaigning on the net for the most part is not playing and people are questioning if he has the stamina to campaign day in and day out or if he has the desire. Seems his wife has more desire then he does because she works the rooms, he doesn’t. The Thompson campaign is bascially a fraud on the GOP and the donors know it and when is the campaign itself going to admit they are going nowhere fast.

    If he had the desire, money, and a competenent staff, he would be out there because he has been making like he is a candidate since the spring. Time is no excuse.

    My question I keep asking is when is he going to release his medical records. More and more reports have him not being able to talk for long, gets very tired, and doesn’t meet and greet the supporters. We need an energetic person not someone that wants to sit behind a keyboard and meet very little people. All you have to do is look at the man and see he does not look well.

  5. cwpete Says:

    Excellent post Justin. You main point that fund raising is “very hard work” is not easily understood or communicated. Those of us who have been involved in fund raising certainly understand exactly what you are saying.

    The only thing that I’d like to add is that it takes considerable amount of time to organize an effective fund raising team. Romney started laying the ground work as early as two years in advance anticipating a potential run. I’m incredible impressed with who hard Romney works.

  6. WatchDog Says:

    Justin – How do you determine that nearly everyone uses Aristotle for voter lists?

    Catalist, VCS, e-Merges.com, McClintock and Associates are the major players.

    Are you associated in some way with Aristotle that you have failed to disclose?

  7. Nonprofit Bridge » Blog Archive » Why People Give Says:

    [...] Why do people give?  I found these ideas on a blog post entitled Fundraising 101: [...]

State of the Race


Obama Approval


Support R4'12

Meta

Recent Posts

Buy This Book

Categories

Archives

Search

Blogroll

Site Syndication

Main