April 20, 2007

He’ll Make You Green with Envy

Rudy Giuliani isn’t easily intimidated on the environment

As Earth Day dawns Sunday, Americans should consider the relationship between environmentalists and the former mayor of the capital of Earth. From New York’s City Hall, Rudolph W. Giuliani successfully confronted green zealots while advancing science and technology. Here again, Giuliani stands well Right of where his detractors might expect.

The West Nile virus debuted in the Western Hemisphere in Queens, New York’s College Point community in August 1999. Among 62 New York State residents who contracted West Nile encephalitis (brain swelling) that year, seven died.

Rather than study the problem to death, that summer and in 2000, Giuliani launched widespread insecticide spraying against West Nile-carrying mosquitoes. Environmentalists went haywire.

The local No Spray Coalition sued to block fumigation. New York’s Green party callously declared: “These diseases only kill the old and people whose health is already poor.”

Giuliani firmly told Newsday that spraying was “perfectly safe.” He added: “There are some people who are engaged in the business of wanting to frighten people out of their minds.” In 2000, he told CNN: “The reality is that danger to human life is more important than birds, fish, and insects.”

Before releasing water-borne larvicide and aerial- and ground-level pesticide, hundreds of Health Department employees used flyers and home visits to urge Queens residents to remain indoors with windows and air ducts closed during nighttime spraying. A 75-person, 24-hour hotline answered 150,000 calls. Doctors and journalists also were briefed.

“The response required daily, continuous communication among many agencies to coordinate,” then-Assistant Health Commissioner Dr. Marcelle Layton told the New York Academy of Sciences on July 12, 2000. “The city also purchased 400,000 cans of mosquito repellent to distribute free of charge, an action modeled on our plans for mass medical distribution in case of bioterrorism. In retrospect, this was a very good decision because stores in some communities in Connecticut did run out of repellent.”

I remember subsequently walking around the evening my Manhattan neighborhood was sprayed. While meandering through the East Village after I should have returned home, I heard an odd buzz and saw a small white pickup a block away, tailed by a white chemical cloud. I jogged to the next corner to avoid inhaling it. Minutes later, the buzz returned, and an insecticide-spewing truck turned the corner and headed toward me along a largely abandoned Third Avenue. I sprinted home and stayed there until morning.

While this was a bit creepy, the good news is that Giuliani’s swift and thorough spraying programs yanked the wings off the mosquitoes that could have turned a manageable West Nile outbreak into a catastrophe.

“Unfortunately West Nile has spread, largely because other mayors didn’t spray when they were cowed by the greens,” says John Berlau, author of Eco-Freaks: Environmentalism Is Hazardous to Your Health. “But West Nile could have become an immediate nationwide epidemic if not for the quick action of Giuliani and his Health Department.”

Other New York politicians caved into the chemophobic activists. “We believe the risk of infection for…residents remains quite low,” Nassau County’s Health Commissioner announced after West Nile-infected mosquitoes reached Long Island in August 2001. But, as the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Angela Logomasini found, “the risk was not low enough for East Meadow residents Adeline Bisignano and Karl Fink. Both became ill with the virus at the end of that same month and died the following November.”

Given West Nile’s documented human toll, Giuliani did the right thing. In 1999, a Russian flare-up sickened 500 people, killing 40. A 1996 outbreak of West Nile meningitis and encephalitis centered in Bucharest, Romania, infected 90,000 and hospitalized 835. Seventeen died.

Environmentalists whined when New York City and Consolidated Edison cooperated to build ten new electrical generating plants and expand another facility where 14th Street meets FDR Drive.

“We object to the fact that our neighborhood is being slammed with pollution,” East River Environmental Coalition president Susan Steinberg complained to gothamgazette.com. “Con Ed, let me breathe” demanded a placard at an April 2001 protest. One demonstrator’s puppet puffed on an asthma nebulizer.

As Giuliani writes in his book, Leadership, “I, too, would have preferred a public park or beautiful housing to a generator on the East River, but I also had to think about the 12,000 megawatts New Yorkers could consume in an hour on a hot day.” Indeed, a 1999 blackout left 300,000 Washington Heights and Inwood residents in the dark for 30 hours.

“My administration’s clear priority in this area is to see that the lights stay on and that electricity continues to flow in New York City,” Giuliani said in a March 27, 2001, power-policy address. “There is no room for complacency as we prepare for the future.” He added: “The City should continue its support of deregulation because, in the long-run, the free market will do the best job of ensuring that New Yorkers get dependable, affordable, and cleaner electricity.”

“The spectacular economic growth that has occurred over the past half-dozen years means that New Yorkers are consuming more electricity. This is fundamentally a good thing,” Giuliani continued. “If New York City’s record job growth enables a family of recent immigrants living in Washington Heights to afford an air conditioner so that they can be more comfortable during the summer months, that is a good thing as well. Everyone needs adequate power to maintain and further improve their quality of life.”

Intriguingly, Giuliani also said: “While cost-effective energy conservation is important, we need to recognize that conservation alone cannot eliminate the need for new power plants located here in New York City.”

This statement violates the First Commandment of Kyotoism: “Thou shalt chop CO2 emissions to 1990 levels.” Good luck expanding an economy with, essentially, 17-year-old energy-consumption targets.

Giuliani also privatized the management of Central Park. While the city still owns Gotham’s gorgeous 843-acre rectangle of flora, bike paths, lakes, lawns, and stages, the Central Park Conservancy, a non-profit, operates it. For New York, this idea was as radical as an American president asking the National Geographic Society to manage Yellowstone National Park.

Today, Giuliani advocates broader domestic production to achieve energy independence as a national-security goal. As he told supporters March 14 at New York’s Sheraton Hotel: “We have to end our reliance on oil from sources that are enemies of the United States.” Last June 13, he told a Manhattan Institute luncheon, “We have to diversify. That’s our strength. You can be independent by being diversified.” Giuliani embraces Alaskan oil drilling, plus natural gas, clean coal, ethanol, and accelerated construction of atomic power plants.

None of this will help America’s Mayor with the eco-freaks, but they hate him anyway. These facts, however, pour yet another spade full of earth on the myth that Rudolph W. Giuliani is some sort of liberal.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

This article originally appeared in the National Review Online on April 20th, 2007. It is reprinted here with the author’s permission

by @ 3:34 pm. Filed under Deroy Murdock, Rudy Giuliani
Trackback URL for this post:
http://race42012.com/2007/04/20/he%e2%80%99ll-make-you-green-with-envy/trackback/

10 Responses to “He’ll Make You Green with Envy”

  1. IR-MN Says:

    Rudy’s anti-environment: Just look at his support from T. Boone Pickens. Thus another reason to detest him. Do we really want another eight years of someone selling our country out to those Arab and Texan oil barons? What’s it going to take for these anti-environment Republicans to wake up to global warming? A category five hurricane hitting NYC?

  2. BarkTwiggs Says:

    It looks like Deroy is pulling out all the stops in trying to ensure Rudy gets the primary votes. This will diminish some of the crossover appeal later, but the environment is not the number 1 issue on either side.

    My guess is on Rudy’s potential posturing will be to adopt the ‘Energy Independence’ mantra. It addresses the polluting/consumptive nature of our economy while at the same time shoring up foreign policy cred by reducing dependence on foreign oil. It’s similar to rhetoric heard from Romney in many of his speeches. Progress and stewardship do not need to be mutually exclusive.

  3. econ grad stud Says:

    Nice campaign ad Murdock

  4. Gamecock Says:

    This column, and especially Rudy’s emphasis on drilling for our own oil causes me to now lean to Rudy.

  5. Tano Says:

    Deroy is vastly overstating his case. No surprise there.

    MOst science-based “ecofreaks” had no problem with spraying vs. the WN virus. Some neighborhood NIMBY types may have, but the argument was not along the lines that DM says.

    And the Central Park Conservancy is an old-line ecoadvocacy group. Environmentalists were thrilled to see them run Central Park.

    I disagree with Rudy on Alaska drilling, but agree on biofuels and clean-coal technology. Nuclear, maybe.

    I wouldnt claim Rudy as a real liberal in these areas, but I bet he would be enormously better than the Bush damin.

  6. Tano Says:

    I did mean “bush admin.”, but it came out ok….

  7. BarkTwiggs Says:

    Lapsus lingua, eh Tano?

  8. TennJoe Says:

    IR-MN, why are the iceaps melting on Mars?
    Must be Bushe’s falt and all our greedy Oil Barrons.

    Did you ever hear of the main cause of Global Warming? It ‘s called THE SUN!

  9. TennJoe Says:

    Rudy is not anti enviornment. He is PRO -HUMANS!

  10. Brian Says:

    “He is PRO-HUMANS!” -> Except humans in utero, of course.

    Can’t say spraying against the West Nile virus is exactly an example of inspiring executive leadership though. Who really cares? Nor does it really show him as a steadfast backbone against global warming alarmists, an area where the Greenies really do have some momentum and public support.

State of the Race


Obama Approval


Support R4'12

Meta

Recent Posts

Buy This Book

Categories

Archives

Search

Blogroll

Site Syndication

Main