John McIntyre penned a fascinating piece?for RCP today regarding a possibly unfolding scenario for in?the ’08 race.

McIntyre starts off with a pretty big assumption however, one that is not shared by myself or many of the writers on this blog; that assumption being that McCain is more likely than not to win the GOP nomination (he tiptoes around this by pinning it to 2006?of course, but you can read it between the lines.)

Regarding McCain:

…McCain who has had the best several weeks of any candidate, in either party. The North Korean nuke provided McCain with an opportunity to burnish his national security pedigree and, more importantly from a nomination standpoint, an opportunity to be partisan.

McCain’s overtly less-partisan style may win him points with the beltway media and Independents but it is a big-time negative with the conservative base he is going to need to win the GOP nomination. His recent attacks on the Clintons over North Korea warmed conservative attitudes toward McCain measurably.

But even better for McCain than Kim Jong-Il’s nuke, the Foley scandal destroyed Republican momentum at a critical time in the campaign and completely threw the GOP back on its heels heading into the midterm homestretch. With the possibility of a Democratic takeover of Congress having risen considerably these last few weeks, McCain is well positioned to pick up the pieces from a dispirited and angry Republican party if they indeed lose two weeks from today.

At the end of the day, McCain’s biggest appeal to Republicans in the fight for the nomination will be his claim (credibly) that he can win in 2008. And a Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid could be all McCain needs to convince enough nervous conservatives to get behind him to ensure blowing the Democrats out of the water in 2008.

So where do Hillary, Obama, and the machiavellian twists come in??

Which brings us to the Clintons and where the Democratic race for the nomination stands. The Clintons are the 800-pound gorilla in the Democratic field, and as long as Hillary Clinton is running for president it is difficult to see how anybody else ends up with the nomination. But while that assertion holds true, there is no question that Hillary’s grip on the nomination has slipped these last 12 months, and she is not as much the lock she was a year ago.

What is really fascinating when gaming out the Clintons’ strategy to win back the White House is how they deal with the very real possibility of a McCain nomination. And, really, the only way Hillary Clinton can “deal” with a McCain nomination and still preserve her White House options is NOT to run in 2008.

This brings us to Barack Obama and “Meet the Press.”

MR. HARWOOD: … I talked to a former top aide to Bill Clinton last night who said Barack Obama will run in 2008, Hillary Clinton will not. So we’ll see what happens there.

MR. RUSSERT: Hillary Clinton will not?

MR. HARWOOD: That was his prediction.

Obama is clearly the hottest thing to hit the Democratic Party and the Washington media in a long time, which means he is a clear threat to the Clintons’ dominance of the party. If Hillary passes up her ’08 opportunity because of a calculated decision, she is a loser to John McCain in a general election. She does not want to have to face a red-hot and primed Obama in the 2012 primaries. Better to let Obama get his shot in 2008 and have him go down against McCain.

To play with this scenario further, a President McCain might really be one of the best ways for Hillary Clinton to win the presidency. The seeds for Bill Clinton’s successful White House run were laid with the open warfare between conservatives and the first President Bush, epitomized by Pat Buchanan’s sizable 35 percent in the 1992 New Hampshire GOP primary. Given McCain’s temperament and history there is a very good chance conservatives would be thoroughly disgusted with a President McCain heading into 2012, laying the table perfectly for Hillary Clinton to win the White House after 12 years of Republican rule.

This may all be a little Machiavellian for some, but the chess pieces are moving on the 2008 presidential board. With the odds of McCain winning the GOP nomination greatly improved by a Republican rout in ’06, the possibility that Hillary Clinton may indeed take a pass on 2008 has to be more seriously considered.

McIntyre’s scenario is a great illustration?of why I fear a McCain nomination/presidency. I can envision four-years of President McCain arguing with his own?party over Immigraiton, signing the Kyoto Treaty,?and letting the Bush Tax Cuts expire, among others things that will deeply anger the conservative base.

Most people believe?that Al Gore’s downfall in 2000?was mainly caused by the fallout of Monicagate and other Clinton scandals. Although those factors did contribute significantly, they were not the root cause.?

The truth that lies?behind that loss of a sitting Vice President, whose term stretched over 8 years of “peace”?and economic prosperity,?is in?Bill Clinton’s triangulation of foreign and domestic policies that drove dependable Democratic voters to The Greens (for the best analysis of effect of Triangulation?on the Democratic Party, please read Christopher Hitchens’ seminal “No One Left to Lie To“, which in addition to being required reading for?truly understanding the “Clinton Years”, is the most devestating political biography I have ever read… bar none. Pretty?big feat for a book of only 150 pages!)

The President of the Unites States is the leader?of his party in addition to being?the leader of our country. John McCain is an honorable man?and an?American Hero. His being a “Good Republican” however, is the subject of much debate.

It’s a debate that we must have, for the consequences (as the Democrats are discovering) can be?far reaching. ??